Bumping this thread to say that I think we should send something electronic next year, something with a lot of bass and doof doof doof noises, or at the very least, something that isn't a ballad about being dumped written by the same songwriting team that has probably written the entries for three other countries that year. I don't think we will, though. I think we'll send something that sounds like a song that didn't do very well in 2019, and then act surprised when it doesn't do very well in 2020 either (I thought our entry this year sounded a bit like Iceland's 2018 entry, and that did very badly). Part of the reason people in Europe don't vote for us may be political (we are ghastly), but we're not the only terrible country, and countries with homophobic laws on the books still wind up doing better than us with the gay crowd because their songs sound like something sometimes.
I think some of it is ego - established British artists are too nervous to put themselves up for a competition in case they don't do very well (and, as was stated above, some of the artists are much too cool and exclusive to send a good song to Eurovision, because "all Eurovision songs are bad", and they don't want their incredibly cool fanbase to think they sold out). And then some of it might be that the BBC and the record company executives want to be the ones in control, so when Paloma Faith says she'd do Eurovision if she gets creative control over the music, all the executives ignore her because they don't want someone going into a contest with Europeans doing whatever they please. Anything could happen! The U.K. might come last if we did that! There is no point in saying "the U.K. came last anyway" because it would be as if you hadn't spoken at all.