ESC United Mod Team
Super Moderator
- Joined
- February 10, 2021
- Posts
- 214
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes I’ve seen messages on twitter about Keren Peles. It was going viral mixed with other gossips. It’s hard to debunk.So I have been vaccuuming the Swedish news room for updates on this matter and here's what has been established so far.
The Swedish police has talked to everyone involved and are more or less done with their initial assesment. They have stated that Joost has admitted wrong doing. The target for his action was a young photographer working for the EBU. The police has been in contact with the DA/prosecutors office and it seems like this is in fact going to go to trial. Allthough that descision has not been made yet, the police believe they have enough of a case to get a verdict.
Keren Peles who are one of the songwriters of Israels entry has recieved over 4000 hate messages (and counting) through social media, most of them from the Netherlands. She had nothing to do with the incident that got Joost disqualified though and she is not the same person as the photographer who was in the altercation with Joost.
As been presented earlier in this thread, since this is a police matter, the EBU probably has been prevented or adviced by their legal team not to comment further on this situation until the investigation is over. The EBU might not have had much of a say in the matter even.
I have also seen people lashing out on SVT in this thread which I really don't get. They had nothing to do with the incident and they had nothing to do with the descision to disqualify and just like EBU their hands are probably tied when it comes to communication on the matter even though their responsibility to present anything ended when the broadcast ended so I dont really get why they would be to blame for anything.
Thank you for this. Does indeed shed some light on why both sides may have a very different view on the whole situation.It appears privacy laws are looser in Sweden. Here in NL it's not allowed to film someone when they tell you they do not want to be filmed, but apparently in Sweden that is different. The Swedish expert also looked at the charge. if it would come to a conviction, then a fine would be the usual penalty for this kind of thing.
Camera was broken but there are multiple witnessesIf this incident involves a cameraperson, there must be photo or video evidence that could be used in the case?
So why weren’t Israel penalised for their delegation harassing people left right and centre? THAT is what we are pissed off aboutNew statement from the EBU:
“The Dutch artist Joost Klein was disqualified from the Grand Final of this year’s Eurovision Song Contest following threatening behaviour directed at a female member of the production crew. Swedish police have investigated the offence, and the case will soon be handed over to the prosecutor in an accelerated procedure.
Joost’s behaviour was in clear breach of Contest rules which are designed to ensure there is a safe working environment for all staff and to protect the production. We are not pre-judging the legal process but, given the circumstances of what occurred and the fact that the police case will shortly be handed to the prosecutor, it would not have been appropriate for Joost to participate in the Grand Final.
The decision to exclude him was backed by the Contest’s governing body of Members – the Eurovision Song Contest Reference Group – and unanimously supported by the EBU Executive Board, following a thorough internal investigation.
The version of events released in some public comments and on social media does not correspond with the statements shared with us and the Swedish Police by staff and witnesses. However, the matter is now subject to legal proceedings and there is unfortunately nothing further we can add at this stage.
We have a zero-tolerance policy towards inappropriate behaviour at our events and will always take necessary action to address threats to staff – no matter who they come from.”
Will be interesting to see what happens.
So why weren’t Israel penalised for their delegation harassing people left right and centre? THAT is what we are pissed off about
Because the main arguments behind everything that has gone wrong this year all lead back to this special treatment that KAN were given and it needs to be called out, especially if another delegation are reported to have behaved in a similar fashion with no consequence (as reported by various other delegations)No offence and this isn't targeted at you specifically but why is this the kneejerk response? I've seen it all over twitter etc. "But what about..." and then linking back in Israel. That's a totally different incident (or series of) and not at all linked to this one - yeah the zero tolerance policy should apply to all but this whataboutism is ridiculous. What pisses me off is that it's clear Joost did something especially now it's handed over to prosecutors to go forwards with it and yet so many are still hellbent on defending him or just brushing it off because AVROTROS said so, they liked Joost and he simply could never or cos Israel. I 100% guarantee if it was Eden the fandom would be going ape and believe every word of the female production staff.
Thank you. Wrote something similar in the main thread, should have read here first, you summed it up perfectly.No offence and this isn't targeted at you specifically but why is this the kneejerk response? I've seen it all over twitter etc. "But what about..." and then linking back in Israel. That's a totally different incident (or series of) and not at all linked to this one - yeah the zero tolerance policy should apply to all but this whataboutism is ridiculous. What pisses me off is that it's clear Joost did something especially now it's handed over to prosecutors to go forwards with it and yet so many are still hellbent on defending him or just brushing it off because AVROTROS said so, they liked Joost and he simply could never or cos Israel. I 100% guarantee if it was Eden the fandom would be going ape and believe every word of the female production staff.
Hearsay from some 10 different broadcasters who all state the exact same thing? How do you know nothing happened if you were not there?I already wrote it in the other thread. You weren’t there. You simply don’t know what happened. How can you claim the Israeli delegation did anything wrong when you were NOT THERE!! Only from hearsay? Yeah, great source.
Get over it. Joost and the IL del. behavior are two different things and will be investigated differently!!
By the way, the decision to DQ Joost has been backed by the reference group of which members of different countries are a part of!
So you’d agree the Netherlands were treated inconsistently when compared to how the EBU is now addressing KAN’s behaviour?@HarryUK
By the way, there is also a statement regarding what you pointed out. So it's not over yet and also the behavior of any delegation will be investigated and discussed by the EBU.
here's the link:
EBU Releases Statement Regarding Incidents at Eurovision 2024 - Eurovoix
The European Broadcasting Union has released a statement regarding delegation behavior at the Eurovision Song Contest 2024.eurovoix.com
Here's the text
"Following a week of controversy at the 68th edition of the Eurovision Song Contest, the European Broadcasting Union has released a statement to The Mirror and Irish Independent:
“We regret that some delegations at the Eurovision Song Contest in Malmö didn’t respect the spirit of the rules and the competition both onsite and during their broadcasts,
We spoke to a number of delegations during the event regarding various issues that were brought to our attention.
The EBU’s governing bodies will, together with the heads of delegations, review the events surrounding the ESC in Malmö to move forward in a positive way and to ensure the values of the event are respected by everyone.
Individual cases will be discussed by the event’s governing body, the Eurovision Song Contest Reference Group made up of representatives from participating broadcasters, at its next meeting.”
And nor were you? The Reference Group also need overhauling. It’s not just Martin. For some reason they’ve treated 36 broadcasters one way and one far more leniently.I already wrote it in the other thread. You weren’t there. You simply don’t know what happened. How can you claim the Israeli delegation did anything wrong when you were NOT THERE!! Only from hearsay? Yeah, great source.
Get over it. Joost and the IL del. behavior are two different things and will be investigated differently!!
By the way, the decision to DQ Joost has been backed by the reference group of which members of different countries are a part of!
I just posted the statement of the EBU. I was not there. I rely on official information, not on hearsay or social media. That‘s all I can say.So you’d agree the Netherlands were treated inconsistently when compared to how the EBU is now addressing KAN’s behaviour?
and from what you’ve shared, they were trigger happy in DQing Joost but have left it this long to gather the facts about KAN - the inconsistency is RIFEI just posted the statement of the EBU. I was not there. I rely on official information, not on hearsay or social media. That‘s all I can say.