ESC United Mod Team
Super Moderator
- Joined
- February 10, 2021
- Posts
- 214
Last edited by a moderator:
I am more ok with allowing him to perform tonight and possibly DQing him once he is in fact found guilty, even if it's months in the future. He can be DQ'd anytime, but you can't retroactively put him back on stage should he be found not guilty (which can easily happen).So you’re happy to let a man under investigation for inappropriate behaviour perform tonight?
Of course it’s all alleged at this point but even if he’s later cleared he shouldn’t be allowed to perform tonight.
Would you feel okay if he was allowed to perform tonight and then the investigation concludes he was responsible for what is alleged?
As for "if Joost had really punched someone, Artovos would not support him": yes, men sticking up for other men who have been violent towards women has never happened. Never. Not once in history /s
Then change it to women sticking up for violent men. Nothing new either.yeah sure except that the head of NPO is a woman but ok sure
Then change it to women sticking up for violent men. Nothing new either.
LolYou're blinded by your own prejudices of how things work to actually be able to distinguish what is reality and how you expect things to be.
I feel sorry for Joost and the Dutch fans. The Eurovision Song Contest is supposed to be about fun and brotherhood but it seems we always see controversies.I am more ok with allowing him to perform tonight and possibly DQing him once he is in fact found guilty, even if it's months in the future. He can be DQ'd anytime, but you can't retroactively put him back on stage should he be found not guilty (which can easily happen).
So if he performed tonight and won but say 2/3 months later is found guilty, you DQ him then and do what with the winners’ trophy? Hand it to second place?I am more ok with allowing him to perform tonight and possibly DQing him once he is in fact found guilty, even if it's months in the future. He can be DQ'd anytime, but you can't retroactively put him back on stage should he be found not guilty (which can easily happen).
If he had actually hit a woman as some people say, the broadcaster surely wouldn't call the disqualification "disproportionate and disgraceful".Dutch Eurovision commentator Cornald Maas (AVROTROS) again:
So you’re happy to let a man under investigation for inappropriate behaviour perform tonight?
Of course it’s all alleged at this point but even if he’s later cleared he shouldn’t be allowed to perform tonight.
Would you feel okay if he was allowed to perform tonight and then the investigation concludes he was responsible for what is alleged?
Me in NSCI’m not sure what to believe or who to trust.
Not to mention other members of production crew, who might also feel threatened.But so is the welfare of his alleged victim which does appear to be forgotten a lot amid all these posts. If what is alleged is true, how would she feel to see him perform tonight?
If he had actually hit a woman as some people say, the broadcaster surely wouldn't call the disqualification "disproportionate and disgraceful".