Contact us

TURKEY 2013 - not taking part

Mickey

Well-known member
Joined
March 20, 2010
Posts
2,469
Location
United Kingdom
I think the EBU need to - like in 2009 - give us a full details of the jury voting per country and also obligate countries to say who's in jury (I know in Belgium they do that, but in some not)

Countries are obliged to reveal the names of their jurors on air during the final. It's in the rules.
 

Franco

Well-known member
Joined
February 21, 2012
Posts
4,372
Location
Church of Valentina
Shame for the Turkish fans though for having such an awful sore loosers TRT.


Why put the shame on them? They have no more control over TRT than you have over SVT. xshrug
 

A-lister

Veteran
Joined
December 28, 2009
Posts
32,825
Why put the shame on them? They have no more control over TRT than you have over SVT. xshrug

I didn't write shame on, I wrote shame for which means that I feel sorry for the Turkish fans for TRT's behavior. Of course it's not the fans fault! I never wrote/meant anything like that.
 

Jim

Well-known member
Joined
March 27, 2010
Posts
7,194
Location
Greece
Maybe it will be better to have 75% televoting and 25% juries in the combine results, at least in the semi-finals. Or another option is to have both juries and televoting but to let to all the countries to choose the way of their voting. For example, Turkey maybe would choose 100% televoting, Greece maybe would choose 50% televoting and 50% jury voting, France maybe would choose 100% jury voting. What do you think?
 

Venage

Member
Joined
March 1, 2012
Posts
749
Maybe it will be better to have 75% televoting and 25% juries in the combine results, at least in the semi-finals. Or another option is to have both juries and televoting but to let to all the countries to choose the way of their voting. For example, Turkey maybe would choose 100% televoting, Greece maybe would choose 50% televoting and 50% jury voting, France maybe would choose 100% jury voting. What do you think?

I guess it's no use discussing this as the Big 5 are obviously happy the way it is. Therefore the EBU won't dare changing the voting system any time soon.
 

A-lister

Veteran
Joined
December 28, 2009
Posts
32,825
Maybe it will be better to have 75% televoting and 25% juries in the combine results, at least in the semi-finals. Or another option is to have both juries and televoting but to let to all the countries to choose the way of their voting. For example, Turkey maybe would choose 100% televoting, Greece maybe would choose 50% televoting and 50% jury voting, France maybe would choose 100% jury voting. What do you think?

I'm not a fan of the juries, but changing the system because ONE country that is probably the largest benefiter of totally biased diaspora votes want their unfair votes back is NOT an option imo. It's actually ridiculous that TRT whine and so blatantly want to go back to a system which was clearly unfair. I bet they don't even want the countries to be put into pots either in the semi-finals. This is probably one of the worst examples of sore losers I've seen in ESC. With such an attitude I won't miss them. For so many years they have ended up unfairly in the top. 10's and now they whine.

However I'm not a fan of the juries either, but it was clear the past system was not fair either.
 

Venage

Member
Joined
March 1, 2012
Posts
749
I'm not a fan of the juries, but changing the system because ONE country that is probably the largest benefiter of totally biased diaspora votes want their unfair votes back is NOT an option imo. It's actually ridiculous that TRT whine and so blatantly want to go back to a system which was clearly unfair. I bet they don't even want the countries to be put into pots either in the semi-finals. This is probably one of the worst examples of sore losers I've seen in ESC. With such an attitude I won't miss them. For so many years they have ended up unfairly in the top. 10's and now they whine.

However I'm not a fan of the juries either, but it was clear the past system was not fair either.

This.

The current system might not be optimal, but it's the best compromise between fans of the televote and haters of diaspora votes.
 

A-lister

Veteran
Joined
December 28, 2009
Posts
32,825
This.

The current system might not be optimal, but it's the best compromise between fans of the televote and haters of diaspora votes.

Well, I'm a jury hater aswell :lol:

But I also hate the biased diaspora votes. I will never support nationalistic type of voting where only the country matter but not the song.
 

Impressive

Banned
Joined
September 1, 2012
Posts
2,678
Location
Istanbul
@Jim Type 1 could happen but this is not the way to solve problem.
 

Impressive

Banned
Joined
September 1, 2012
Posts
2,678
Location
Istanbul
Edited by moderator, please refer to the Board Rules.
"1. Please avoid excessive bad language, personal attacks and racist or obscene behavior. Failure to stick to these simple rules may ultimately lead to the banning of your account or IP address from the forum. Moderators & Admins reserve the right to ban offenders from the board, temporarily or permanently, without warning. Any disciplinary action will NOT be discussed on the board or in chat."
 

CC92

Well-known member
Joined
May 31, 2011
Posts
7,684
Location
Berlin
I definitely favour having some diaspora votes in (it's not they're lost with the 50/50 'jury' vote anyway) over political voting, bribing, intransparency and last but not least the 'jury's' obsession with safe/cheese entries and hatred towards anything local. Apart from Italy, the Big5 have on balance not fared better with the 'jury' votes yet so they should be okay with the removal of the 'jury' as well.

It's true that Turkey does benefit from diaspora voting and it probably would have more impact if a less favoured broadcaster complained but I fail to see why they shouldn't state their opinion. The 'jury' thing doeth not effect only Turkey after all. xshrug
 

BGN

Well-known member
Joined
December 19, 2010
Posts
1,245
Like it or not, Turkey is very important and worthy member of the Eurovision family and that they are leaving will bring very deep and not so pleasent consequences to the contest.
50:50 system is just half solution to the problem with the Eurovision voting and proved its' incapability to make the voting more fair. So EBU must continue to search and try new solutions.
 

Venage

Member
Joined
March 1, 2012
Posts
749
Like it or not, Turkey is very important and worthy member of the Eurovision family and that they are leaving will bring very deep and not so pleasent consequences to the contest.

Turkey may be an important member, but it will most likely not bring any dire consequences to the contest. The EBU wouldn't dare upsetting the Big 5 by changing the voting system.
 

BGN

Well-known member
Joined
December 19, 2010
Posts
1,245
Turkey may be an important member, but it will most likely not bring any dire consequences to the contest. The EBU wouldn't dare upsetting the Big 5 by changing the voting system.

TRT pays fee which is very close to what UK for example pays and I doubt that their withdrawal won't bring some unexpected consequences. To start with, there surely will be new fee increase for the other broadcasters and when we have some countries where the border between participation and non-participation is extremely thin, there may be more withdrawals to follow.
 

Scooby

Well-known member
Joined
October 1, 2009
Posts
8,395
Location
Moon
Bosnia is not muslim country jeeeezzzzzz. I dont have anything again Islam, but it constantly connectivity Bosnia with Turkey is really too much
 

A-lister

Veteran
Joined
December 28, 2009
Posts
32,825
Bosnia is not muslim country jeeeezzzzzz. I dont have anything again Islam, but it constantly connectivity Bosnia with Turkey is really too much

Well, tell that to TRT then :lol: I think you know what I meant by that though.
 
Top Bottom