this year's contest was weird.
Azer tried many times to win with strong entries but failed and now with this indifferent performance and Turkeys surprise (?) absence from the final which helped them gain some of their votes, finally won as it had to be their turn this time.
Ukraine brought a real artist and a great art on stage but that wasn't the singer or the song... didn't matter anyway.
Italy in second place with this song just because they came back.
My country always seems to have top 10 success even with an experimental song like this year and I don't know if I must be proud when I'm seeing the same countries vote for us every year no matter what the song is like (if it wasn't Italy's comeback to steal some of our points then Greece would be top5 again). I'm proud for my country's voting though (12p FRA, 10p ITA, 8p GEO, 7 UKR, 6 SWE, 5 AZE, 4 GER, 3 B&H, 2 UK, 1 RUS - something for everyone).
Who are they putting for juries when countries like Azer, Ukraine, Sweden with mediocre songs and voices are placed so high? Noone needs music studies to understand that these entries are nothing special but somehow thanks to the juries they battled for the win.
The jury vote must be based on music criteria not another political-bloc camouflage voting. This is the only way to save us from seeing bloc and cheesy entries to have success. If countries put celebrities, euro-fans, presenters etc on their juries then nothing changes and the bloc party will continue to dominate. By this I don't mean that entries like France or Italy must win the contest (I didn't want France to come first and Azer had better song imo from both FRA and ITA) but it would have more credibility and interest. I'm happy with Denmark, Bosnia, Georgia and Italy even if it was highly overated.
That's all folks. Congrats
. See you all next year.