Bojan
Well-known member
the second biggest shock tonight for me (after Croatia failing) was to see Sweden out of the final too!
I agree, we suck when it comes to who we like to vote for tbh, but we don't get to pick the actual entrants that compete though.FallenAngelII said:How about a 3-way system:
* Televote
* International juries (6-12)
* National juries (6-12)
Each with the same amount of total points to deliver. Screw the people getting 50-50. The Swedish people clearly do not know what is going to do well at ESC.
If I know the swedish people correctly; they would never ever accept it, but probably boycott the whole competition.Margerita86 said:Yes which is why I want both internation jury groups in the final and I also want them to get a group of say 20-30 or however many is needed to actually pick the entrants next year, swedes stay away!Urania said:I'm from Sweden and I certainly do not blame Anna for this fail. I blame us - the people - ...and Christer Björkman. He really needs to go. I think his taste in music is getting too old for this competition and he probably doesn't understand what Europe wants, or else, he wouldn't have let 'This Is My Life' compete in the Melodifestivalen at all. Actually I don't think any of the songs would have worked any better, despite the many Swedish peoples complainants about how Salem would have been soooo amazing.
We seriously need new song writers, because obviously this isn't working.
This sounds like a good idea. More power to the juries who actually know the competition (...however, if we want to do good, the international should have more power). If the Swedish people could accept that there personal taste isn't always the best for Eurovision, but think about what Europe actually would want to hear; It could go better. Still, I think, more power to the juries and less for the people. Just don't remove it completely, if we want to keep some interest left from the SwedesFallenAngelII said:How about a 3-way system:
* Televote
* International juries (6-12)
* National juries (6-12)
Each with the same amount of total points to deliver. Screw the people getting 50-50. The Swedish people clearly do not know what is going to do well at ESC.
It's your personal opinion. My personal opinion is that the song is garbage and her voice is at times weak and about to break. She needs more experience and learn to conquer her nervousness on the stage. This was far from a flawless vocal performance (though very good), her voice is not an ideal pop voice (it's highly niche) and the song is far from great.pavarotti said:Look, it's a great song and Anna sang it beautifully. Only Alyosha of Ukraine put in a better vocal.
You should only be angry at the eejit juries and televoters for ignoring her. To put through the likes of Israel, Georgia, Ireland and Cyprus ahead of Sweden is nothing short of scandalous and totally non-sensical. It just shows the ESC has little to do with song quality and much more about diaspora, political voting and ridiculous qualifying system whereby semi 1 was full of absolute dirge and semi 2 was good enough to be the final.
But let's face it what works well here doesn't work in eurovision and we need a change bad and it starts at the songs picked.ParadiseES said:I don't agree either... You can't know what can do well and what can't. Sometimes you are sure "this is good for eurovision" and you flop and sometimes you think "omg this is not for eurovision" and it appeals.
People must vote for whatever they like
Same thing in eurovision as back home I vote for the song I like best, performer not so important.ParadiseES said:I think you just should not vote for the names, but for the songs. That's all