I don’t think numbers and statistics will be the crux of why some countries qualify and others won’t. 2017 was a year full of smashing records and statistics. Portugal’s first win, Portugal winning with the most points ever, Bulgaria and Moldova cracking top 3, etc. There’s no reason why 2018 can’t be similar.
I think there are so many people out there who are too entangled in statistics. It's fine, interesting and informative once in a while, but people put too much weight on it and can get out of touch with what's currently going on and the essence of it.
Exactly. Statistics are helpful to explain patterns of data from the past but aren't to be used for predictive purposes.
First of all, I really do not want to argue or "fight" in discussions but I feel a bit wrongly interpreted of your comments and that you missed all main point of that
statistical post and this makes me feel a bit bad. So I feel need to clearly state some things and I hope you will understand in good intentionally and not with such misinterpretations.
So, If I offered statistical point of view that doesn't mean I think it is only determinante of one song success! Honestly, I'm a bit shocked that there are immediately derivatived straightforward conclusions about my opinion like it is only factor that I put importance to.
Of course statistics is more for fun and curiosity. It is not at all most important or determinating factor if song will qualify or not or if will make success. (Reason) it is, of course, whole entry including song quality, artist and staging and overall package about delivering it. If it is high quality, there are high chances, no matter what, it will make success.
But in situation where we have, as many think, blood battle in SF1 by songs quality (so many good songs, entries, performances), I was wondering in my
statistical post if there will be role played by statistics (actually if there will be important role played by draw). You can call it statistics, you can call it lucky or whatever. But maybe you can call it "this song is good enough to overcome it no matter what".
As I posted clear evidence, there have been 20 semifinals since 2008! 20! In 20 cases there has never been situation when more songs from first half of SF qualified that more songs from second half! Never! While there have been many cases in favor of second half of SF! This is fact! You can call it fact, you can call it statistics or you can call it (non) coincidence! But I do not think that in all those years, during 20 semifinals in which preformed hundreds of songs, that in every of those 20 SFs every time songs from second half were better (or equal) and from first half never!
We all know, we can read posts here, in threads or comments on other websites and even reviews by famous esc journalists, followers. Nobody is sure who will qualify as there are so many potential candidates like never before!
All I wanted in my statistical post is to offer another point of view where we do not only base on songs, artists, stagings and all things that actually matter (and I kinda feel a bit dumb that I have to point out this and highlight it) but that maybe draw will play (non) significant role. Through all post I'm wondering, I'm trying to see this perspective! As yeah, obviously some records will be broken! Maybe Azerbaijan won't qualify for the first time, maybe Czech Republic will, maybe for the first time in history more songs from first half will qualify than from second half, maybe there will be some other unknown record! Yeah, something likely will happen for the first time and I'm wondering what? It is difficult for me to see less qualifiers from first half as well...even 5 looks small to me as there are many strong entries! So I just have been wondering what will be that determinating factor and if draw will play role in it!
As "prove" for my wondering and unsure I will cite myself and whole point of that post
Hmm...but who knows, maybe history will change and for first time there will be more songs from first half to go to final than from second half?
And that has been whole point of my statistical post and NOT
1) that I wanted to say that statistics the crux of why some countries qualify and others won’t
2) to put too much weight on statistics and lose touch with reality
3) generally, there are statistics methods that are used for predictive purposes but I agree it is should not be used (as factor of high performance) like that in esc