Regardless of what I think of the song, but as far as I understand it, it was the
JURY who made the win possible by putting the
PUBLICS favorite on the fifth place. Now personally I don't care about this, but I'm surprised that all the ones who had so much to say about the "undemocratic juries", who "ignored the peoples decision", who are a sign of a system that unfairly "overrules the wish of many by the personal taste of few", that all of them are so silent now.... No accusing of unfairness, of rigged election process... nothing.
So I ask myself....
Is the jury only "unfair", "undemocratic", etc... when they have a different opinion or taste than some posters here?
Is a decision only "rigged", "corrupt" or "manipulated", when the outcome is not as one wanted it to be?
Should juries only be abolished from the system when they do not decide according to ones personal views?
And let me just stress that I DO NOT THINK, that Salvador won in an unfair or undeserved way.