Good morning Crashworld. I will gladly reply to your interesting message.
Irama would have made a good run at the ESC but do you want to know what position in the standings he would have obtained? From fourth to eighth position. Italy has always reached the "Top 10" because it has always "played to win". When playing for first place you can always reach in the top 10. When you play to reach the "Top 10" there is a risk that you will not always be able to make it. Irama was a "Top 10" artist while the Maneskins can fight for the top spot (and trust me, Crashworld, that dear A-lister knows - in Sweden the Lyllasister were eliminated because of the Maneskin).
Irama had two fundamental problems:
-) Over time the song could go out of fashion. In Italy these songs are known as "Summer Tormentoni", songs with instant success but which over time lose a little of their strength.
-) There is a lot of "catchy song" competition: from San Marino to, I think, Azerbaijan. We had to avoid ending up in this "musical trail".
-) It would have been cut down by some clever Eurofans who would have preferred something else, from San Marino to Australia (yes, I have read of some who considered "Technicolour" a masterpiece ...). If you base this on our historic "lack of strong alliances", Irama was destined to finish second on one of these songs.
I agree when you say that a great staging the song can get more strength but ... that's when the song exists! Honestly, apart from ABBA, Europe and Lundvik's "Too Late For Love" which I still sing, I don't remember a song from Sweden. Commercial songs full of lights. This is also an excellent form of market. But the difference between commercial and quality songs is similar to building a house and the Colosseum. One question, would you ever get Benjamin Ingrosso into "Top 10"? For me it is not an offense for Italy but for the other nations that dream of the "Top 10". In fact, Benji was second in the juries and twenty-third in televoting. So, my thinking is not incomprehensible. I only say what many think but do not say (because it is better not to lose an alliance).
Now I will continue making some considerations that are apparently distant from our speech but in reality they will make you understand why Italy is forced to always have to make difficult decisions (which make it even more unpleasant to those who would like us below).
Italy was considered by some users to be "overrated". I don't speak Italian but as a music lover, is this really what my ears must hear? We Italians are normally peaceful and suffer from a syndrome, the "syndrome of xenophilia". What is this syndrome? It is an exaggerated form of respect towards foreign countries. We often close our eyes to our beauties and see with admiration the efforts abroad. We are accustomed to praising many companies distant from ours. However, when we read and hear bad things about us ... well ... we fight! Not with violence but with the hard, thorny and insurmountable force of logic. Do you want to make comparisons? Ok! Let's do them!
Why, instead of calling ourselves "overrated", do we not accept that we are a capable nation? A nation that musically must not be overestimated or underestimated. When I read "overrated" by some users' messages, I notice a certain impatience.
This is due to a profound reason. How does Italy, without any alliance, be competitive every year? This is annoying because it clearly makes it clear that "Made in Italy" is synonymous with quality and ... when A-lister and company see this, even if they help each other and win, they don't really feel like winners. Pyrrhic's victories are useless. So we are accused of being "bearers of old ballads" and "conservatives". Let's go back to the alliances, it was not us Italians but the BBC that brought the issue of "voting blocks" to the attention. Historically, we Italians have no alliance: we have friendships with France, Germany, Spain, Greece, Cyprus, Malta, Croatia, Albania, Portugal and Switzerland but they are not real alliances. Yet, after all this, we are always competitive ... this tears the hearts of our detractors. Crashworld ... ESC is something wonderful and I'm glad it brought us all closer but don't believe the twinkling lights.
Europe should not take an example from sparkling lights without content but from a text full of passion to which it can add a skilful staging. Otherwise, it's all... false...
However, in my short life (I am young but not very young), I have learned to look beyond the flags and evaluate people, one by one. Because if it is true that there is a detractor, there is always a Mauve with whom you can exchange balanced speeches and laugh. When I spoke, many posts back, of Brit-fans I was referring to some individuals who have chosen to join together and come here to "spit judgments" and 0 accompanied by caustic words. I have seen many other Brit fans who have enjoyed our music and I am happy with that. I don't want 12s, I also accept 0s but this must be done without any malice. I continue to like Preuss, Mrm and many others who half like or don't consider our song as "Top 10".
I want to close the message by telling you that, in addition to the quality we have, in the light of what has been explained, Irama was not the right choice and that if the thinking of some users is changing it is because we Italians are here to explain our music with respect. This is what I did with Daniels1000, I did not offend him but I explained to him the technique behind the "shouting", as Edweis herself explained to me some things I was not aware of about the Ukrainian singer .
Well ... now I can die of a heart attack ... after this long conversation I have no energy left haha.
A kiss for you, Crashworld.