escYOUnited
Administrator
- Joined
- September 28, 2009
- Posts
- 1,355
the juries last year made Mahmood winOk, I slept, I re-listened, I reassessed... and I am in a similar position as Rainy, only because of different songs.
I still think Francesco was the better option. I had about 8 songs I liked better - especially in direct comparison, I think a kinda similar Dov'è from Le Vibrazioni was a little better. I am baffled how the juries consistently keep ditching the huge televote faves (and I am especially surprised that can happen when Francesco and PTI combined got almost 80% of the televote!). But who am I to be butthurt, when Sanremo's level of competition is this insane.
Fai rumore is great! I am not 100% convinced by the verses, but the chorus is to die for. Once it kicks in, my soul just melts away and all my doubts are gone. Feel free to hate it, because it is another Italian ballad, but it is a great one, so - screw you! This is might not win, but it is gonna do very well.
Have a , , and welcome to my n°1 spot so far.
And they repeated that this year with Diodato, who only got 23,9% from the televote, while Francesco got 39% and PTN 37%. That's precisely what I am talking aboutthe juries last made Mahmood win
Eurovision is clearly consisting of two main camps, the "conservatives" (backed up by the juries in ESC) that wouldn't mind a contest filled with only conventional ballads, and the "progressives" (backed up more by the televoters in ESC) that don't mind more contemporary, risky and/-or national motived entries... unfortunately Sanremo (and also FiK in Albania) are contests that cater mostly to the first group, and we can see division here in the fanbase as well, we had a contemporary fresh entry in Andromeda but we ended up with a dated meh ballad instead.
As things are going, the "conservatives" are winning the battle over ESC (with the help of juries), Italy was onto something the last couple of years, so I hoped they would finally step into the new millenium, but unfortunately we are now back to what Italy usually was and entries like Mahmood might have been just some temporary fluke for Italy and ESC. The contest may be entering 2020, but it looks more and more like the 1980s when it was dominated by conventional ballads.
Excuse me, but this is absolutely ridiculous. There are loads of people here, me included, that loves a variety when it comes to ESC. We can't have a year filled with ballads (like 2015), that makes it boring. But you can't have a year filled with entries that is just uptempo and has no emotional feel to it. The six songs that has been selected so far has been very far from each other genrewise. We got the modern radiofriendly popbanger (), the more eurovision-friendly version of it (), the afrobeat pop (), the dramatic ballad (), the crazy and over the top dubstep-rap-pop-madness () and now the typical Italian ballad with a slight touch of the 90s ().
I often read your comments and throughout the years I just can't understand...What is it you want then? You don't want songs to be old-fashioned, but you hate often on the modern pop songs, especially if they are in english. You don't want ballads, but to be honest, it is quite rare I see you support the most uptempo songs either. You have a lot of opinions, and that is great, we all have different opinions and is of course welcome to have those, but I just want to know what kind of contest you want? Cause sometimes I just don't understand what you are after.
And for all the others here that has written, not only here but in other places in the forum, about people faking to like something and such, that is absolutely ridiculous and not even funny, even if it is meant as a joke.
Eurovision is clearly consisting of two main camps, the "conservatives" (backed up by the juries in ESC) that wouldn't mind a contest filled with only conventional ballads, and the "progressives" (backed up more by the televoters in ESC) that don't mind more contemporary, risky and/-or national motived entries... unfortunately Sanremo (and also FiK in Albania) are contests that cater mostly to the first group, and we can see division here in the fanbase as well, we had a contemporary fresh entry in Andromeda but we ended up with a dated meh ballad instead.
As things are going, the "conservatives" are winning the battle over ESC (with the help of juries), Italy was onto something the last couple of years, so I hoped they would finally step into the new millenium, but unfortunately we are now back to what Italy usually was and entries like Mahmood might have been just some temporary fluke for Italy and ESC. The contest may be entering 2020, but it looks more and more like the 1980s when it was dominated by conventional ballads.
I don't think the division is that clear. I love me a ballad and I love me some risky entry, national motives are great as well... Provided these entries are actually good in their genre (subjectively according to my taste of course). Amar Pelos Dois, Zero Gravity, La Venda, Spirit in the Sky, Occidentalis Karma, Fuego, Az én apám... All are my s and I am sure I am not alone (not with s for these particular songs, but rather with - hopefully - not really focusing on the genre or the modern / conservative divide first).
I generally don´t like this "camp mentality" and also wouldn´t consider myself as part of either camp. I really love ballads, but also enjoy uptempo songs and sometimes even a good disco track.
This. Perhaps some people truly feel the need to come to a dedicated Eurovision forum (e. g., a space that is largely anonymous, as much as it is intimate to an extent) to showcase their pretentious taste about things they don't even like - but IMO, such people had already written Eurovision off, they don't really give a damn about it. This concept doesn't really make much sense to me.And for all the others here that has written, not only here but in other places in the forum, about people faking to like something and such, that is absolutely ridiculous and not even funny, even if it is meant as a joke.