AWS beat Saara both with Juries and Televoters (easily here), so if Sennek and co. couldnt even come close to Saara (14+ Points margin is pretty much), they wouldnt even have come close to AWS, who was proven unlucky in the Semi to have the wrong Juries voting there. This also proves that they would have qualified much clearlier in Semi1 than 2. So no, Im objective right, like always when we have some mathematical Discussions and I won the Argument despite being in the Minority.
Yes, AWS won over Saara in the final (just with 5p in jury...but 42 points in televote which is an easy win indeed). But it all comes down to the countries they are in the semi with. Sure, looking at the countries that voted for Hungary in the final, it is interesting that the televotes comes mainly from semi 2 voting ones, but the jury points comes mainly from the first semi (Azerbaijan, Greece and Cyprus being the three that gave the most jury points). These might have given the same, or even more in a potential semi 1 for AWS. But this is only speculation, it is really hard to see how many points AWS would have got, it all depends on draw and what people are on the mood for on the night. Also, remember that Hungary was in pot 4 in the semifinal allocation pots, together with for example Azerbaijan, Greece and Cyprus, so one of those three wouldn't be in the same semi nevertheless. Let's say Azerbaijan wasn't, then Hungary would lose at least 8 points, which might have been a differece in such a tight semi. Azerbaijan however could earn at least 18 points each from one of Russia, Malta or Ukraine there instead of the 0 from Armenia, which could have been enough to qualify.
But after all, it is just speculation, we will never know for sure. But I do agree with [MENTION=16481]BorisBubbles[/MENTION], I think that semi 2 were better for some countries, like Azerbaijan or Armenia, they could have made it through with a decent draw.
I think and are the biggest Winners.
you mean the thread you single handedly killed by repeating "diaspora-adjusted" and "table midfield" untill all of us had to call an ambulance because we gouged our own eyes out? yes, after that thread we all knew you won't ever back down from your insanity. you are bad at numbers and words and i feel so sorry that someone ever told you otherwise. be better.I want answer this post, cause I know Im right, although Im in the Minority. The same happened in tthe Jury-Hate-Thread last year.
you mean the thread you single handedly killed by repeating "diaspora-adjusted" and "table midfield" untill all of us had to call an ambulance because we gouged our own eyes out? yes, after that thread we all knew you won't ever back down from your insanity. you are bad at numbers and words and i feel so sorry that someone ever told you otherwise. be better.
SF1 being more competitive was the talk of town last year and that was with LESS usually auto-qualifying countries. before we had the songs we actually thought SF2 would be the bloodbath one. many NQers of semi 1 would easily qualify in semi 2 by knocking serbia, slovenia and/or hungary out (as sad as that would be because those three countries were so good last year).
Semi 2 draw winners:
Austria/Switzerland/Germany triangle,
Unfortunately not, we are unpolitical countries who respect the spirit of eurovision in the opposite to other countries who share the same language. We were f.e. one of only 5 (out of 20) countries who gave 0 to Timebelle and therefore prevented them from qualifying.
That's true for the fraudulent German juries each year, but televote is usually fine
Semi 2 draw winners:
Denmark/Sweden/Norway triangle
Austria/Switzerland/Germany triangle, Austria ships with Netherlands, Switzerland with Italy
Lithuania with 3 allies: Ireland, UK, Latvia
Albania thanks to Italy and Macedonia and Switzerland
Lithuania with 3 allies: Ireland, UK, Latvia