A-lister
Veteran
- Joined
- December 28, 2009
- Posts
- 32,825
I say the same as above, and in the majority of European countries, English is understood by a majority, if not a very large minority. Yes there are probably exceptions to this, but in general that is the case in European countries - even in say France, which places an extremely high value on its own language and has a very strong national identity itself - much stronger than the English-speaking nations incidentally.
You have a very narrow-minded view on Europe. Yes, in general English is the "second language", but there are still regions where Russian or German or even some other language is the "second language". In no doubt English is slowly taking over that role even in those countries, but we're not there just yet.
Well then what do you propose should happen? A language rule is against freedom of choice but no language rule leads to 'everything' being in English. Seeing as many countries still sing in their native languages, I strongly believe that no language rule is better .
I've proposed it before. I think the juries should have in their guidelines to encourage songs in native languages, or we could just kick out the juries once and for all and see what will happen then, maybe have some sort of % rule. Many countries sing in native languages? Do we watch the same show? I hope you know why this thread started, because almost NO countries chose to sing in native language any longer, and with this progress there will be none in just a couple of years time.
If the United Kingdom sent an entry in French do you think that it would be representing French culture? Of course not. It would still be representing British culture, just in another language. By having an entry in English does not impose a culture on anybody and in fact it is the countries themselves who are choosing to sing in English, nobody's forcing them - not the English-speaking contestants and not the EBU!
I beg to differ. A language is an integrated and important part of what makes a nation and a culture. The reason why English has the status it has is because of historical world order of imperialism and domination (firstly by UK/England and then by USA) and not because it's some self-chosen thing around the world. English is NOT representing all cultures and countries there are in Europe, it is just representing a historical fact more or less.
Have we had this discussion some hundred years ago it would have been about French, during the 1930's German would have been the topic here.. so you mean that imperialism and domination "represents" cultures?
And no, just as much as I don't think you could say English represent non-English speaking countries' cultures, I don't think French could really represent English culture either (to comment your example).
But there are two aspects of this discussion which should not be forgotten, and you have been mentioning it aswell. There's the language aspect, where English is more or less taking over 100%, and then there's the more music-cultural aspect, where up until the juries you could have success with let's say an ethno-pop song (although in English) but now not even that works! Which leaves us with English language only and music only inspired by the Anglo-music culture (mostly USA).
So much for European diversity huh?
Last edited: