i anixi
Well-known member
- Joined
- March 20, 2011
- Posts
- 2,291
How could so many people be corruptible and how could anyone manage to do it? What for, for that matter? I'm sure Sweden was in no hurry to win again. If they were, they didn't need to do it nastily, their song was big enough to do it alone.
I for once am very happy for the jury's existence. Italy's song was a turgid piece of latino cheese, populist to the bone. I have no doubt the juries smelled it. It was also said by some watching the TV feed that Il Volo were somehow out of tune during the jury's rehearsal. Maybe juries have penalised them for that as well.
Furthermore, juries can not be expected to vote in the same line as the public all the time. For one thing, they have no idea what the public's choice will be, nobody has, for certain.
Anyways, Sweden is a most deserving winner, and a very good one at that, and it won according to all the current rules agreed by all beforehand.
I for once am very happy for the jury's existence. Italy's song was a turgid piece of latino cheese, populist to the bone. I have no doubt the juries smelled it. It was also said by some watching the TV feed that Il Volo were somehow out of tune during the jury's rehearsal. Maybe juries have penalised them for that as well.
Furthermore, juries can not be expected to vote in the same line as the public all the time. For one thing, they have no idea what the public's choice will be, nobody has, for certain.
Anyways, Sweden is a most deserving winner, and a very good one at that, and it won according to all the current rules agreed by all beforehand.