Contact us

United Kingdom UNITED KINGDOM 2014 - Molly - Children of the Universe

How do you rate the entry?

  • 12

    149 35.3%
  • 10

    56 13.3%
  • 8

    54 12.8%
  • 7

    36 8.5%
  • 6

    25 5.9%
  • 5

    26 6.2%
  • 4

    13 3.1%
  • 3

    8 1.9%
  • 2

    12 2.8%
  • 1

    11 2.6%
  • 0

    32 7.6%

  • Total voters
    422

Leydan

Super Moderator 🌴
Staff member
Joined
March 1, 2013
Posts
18,862
Location
UK
No. Just no. Jordan. Hell no. :lol:
 

MrJadeEwen

Well-known member
Joined
October 1, 2009
Posts
4,346
Location
Bognor Regis
Katie Price said in a recent interview her only regret in life is the Eurovision selection show, so we can thankfully rule her out! :D
 

Leydan

Super Moderator 🌴
Staff member
Joined
March 1, 2013
Posts
18,862
Location
UK
I bet she only says she regrets it, is because she didn't win it. :lol:
 

Deleted member 8866

Guest
No Katie Price, please, I beg you! She looked like the long lost fifth Teletubbie in that dreadful "dress".
 

Leydan

Super Moderator 🌴
Staff member
Joined
March 1, 2013
Posts
18,862
Location
UK
The day she signs for us will be the day we have truly given up.
 

Leydan

Super Moderator 🌴
Staff member
Joined
March 1, 2013
Posts
18,862
Location
UK
How about them in a duo. xrofl2 the gruesome twosome. haha
 

penguinperson

Active member
Joined
July 7, 2011
Posts
1,190
The Voice season 3 is moving to January as I have speculated before. Unless they use that to send the act (they won't) I would imagine the BBC will pick internally. They won't have two singing shows on the channel at once as it would damage both.

Interview with Little Boots here where she talks about ESC http://sosogay.co.uk/2013/sorry-i-d...buffer&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Buffer

She is more than willing to write the song for any act. She'd do it herself if the song was 100% right for her and the timing was right. LB like most other artists say that the worst thing about doing it would not be the contest itself but taking part in a UK national final and failing at that stage. So many acts have said the same in the past. It is failing at home which holds acts back not Eurovision itself. Therefore it comes back to the BBC's reputation of 'what should be sent'


BBC Points of View on Eurovision
--------------------------------

Hi ?????

I'd suggest that you send your letter again in time for the next Eurovision?

You say that the contest costs approximately £12.5 million to host, which sounds about right, I've seen similar figures, some up to about £20 million.

A cost of this size for one programme would present difficulties.

The BBC can't regain the cost of the event through advertising revenue as Sweden did, because it doesn't carry advertising - so any income generated would have to come from ticket sales.

If you took a venue like the 02, that has a capacity of 20,000 seats.
So to cover costs the BBC would hypothetically have to charge a minimum of£625 for every seat. Bearing in mind that the BBC give seats for other BBC programmes - like Strictly - away (and I'm not sure that they *could* actually charge for them using BBC rules) but if they did, the price of seats would be astronomically expensive.

So how much would the programme cost in comparison to other major programmes like Strictly Come Dancing?

You can get an idea of what programmes cost to make, by looking at this page.

www.bbc.co.uk/commis...

Eurovision would be a "The high end of the entertainment spectrum. Examples include traditional Saturday night entertainment shows on BBC One" which come in at around £200,000 per hour.

So Eurovision at £20,000,000 million would be using the budget of 100 peak time Saturday night shows, that's nearly 50% of the entire year's budget for a one hour Saturday night time slot.

When deciding how to spend budgets they look at the expected number of viewers

www.esctoday.com/646...

It has been reported (see above) that 7.7 million viewers watched the Eurovision Song Contest with a peak at 9.22 million between 22:45 and 23:00 BST (21:45 and 22:00 GMT) - so about 35% of the viewing public watched.

Which leaves the question, would be it be right to spend the budget for 100 peak time programmes, on just one programme, that only a third of the population are likely to watch?

Remember that I don't work for programme commissioning, so these are just some sums that I've done on the back of an envelope. I think it gives an idea of the situation though...

------------

They haven't got a scooby do they about funding or how other broadcasters are run.
 

Sean

Admin
Staff member
Joined
September 28, 2009
Posts
17,246
Location
Calgary
^ Interesting, that article says Cocknbullkid is interested but I can't find a source for that anywhere. She'd be great too, why aren't the BBC jumping on these chances?
 

Mickey

Well-known member
Joined
March 20, 2010
Posts
2,469
Location
United Kingdom
BBC Points of View on Eurovision
--------------------------------

Hi ?????

I'd suggest that you send your letter again in time for the next Eurovision?

You say that the contest costs approximately £12.5 million to host, which sounds about right, I've seen similar figures, some up to about £20 million.

A cost of this size for one programme would present difficulties.

The BBC can't regain the cost of the event through advertising revenue as Sweden did, because it doesn't carry advertising - so any income generated would have to come from ticket sales.

If you took a venue like the 02, that has a capacity of 20,000 seats.
So to cover costs the BBC would hypothetically have to charge a minimum of£625 for every seat. Bearing in mind that the BBC give seats for other BBC programmes - like Strictly - away (and I'm not sure that they *could* actually charge for them using BBC rules) but if they did, the price of seats would be astronomically expensive.

So how much would the programme cost in comparison to other major programmes like Strictly Come Dancing?

You can get an idea of what programmes cost to make, by looking at this page.

www.bbc.co.uk/commis...

Eurovision would be a "The high end of the entertainment spectrum. Examples include traditional Saturday night entertainment shows on BBC One" which come in at around £200,000 per hour.

So Eurovision at £20,000,000 million would be using the budget of 100 peak time Saturday night shows, that's nearly 50% of the entire year's budget for a one hour Saturday night time slot.

When deciding how to spend budgets they look at the expected number of viewers

Spanish press conference out of hand again (pics!) - esctoday.com...

It has been reported (see above) that 7.7 million viewers watched the Eurovision Song Contest with a peak at 9.22 million between 22:45 and 23:00 BST (21:45 and 22:00 GMT) - so about 35% of the viewing public watched.

Which leaves the question, would be it be right to spend the budget for 100 peak time programmes, on just one programme, that only a third of the population are likely to watch?

Remember that I don't work for programme commissioning, so these are just some sums that I've done on the back of an envelope. I think it gives an idea of the situation though...

------------

They haven't got a scooby do they about funding or how other broadcasters are run.

Where did you get that from?

EDIT - Found it BBC - Points Of View Messageboard - BBC Television programmes - Eurovision 2013
 

Scooby

Well-known member
Joined
October 1, 2009
Posts
8,395
Location
Moon
First Blue, than Englebert, followed by Grandma Bony ... who is next The Waterboys or Fleetwood Mac :lol:
 

Anjeza

Active member
Joined
October 9, 2009
Posts
2,359
Location
Berlin,Germany
Following their system from the past years it must be a has-been girl group - so what about All Saints or Bananarama? :lol:

But to get real, I would love to see someone like Ellie Goulding or John Newman at ESC - but I thin that it won't happen xcry
 

Leydan

Super Moderator 🌴
Staff member
Joined
March 1, 2013
Posts
18,862
Location
UK
Well its about time we get a girl group up there hahaha. Maybe we could get the cast of Loose Women together to rival Latvia 2012. :lol:
 
Top Bottom