I know emotions are running high about ~the contract, but do we know that those requirements are actually unreasonable? From what I heard, it's basically required that the broadcaster gets the rights to the song, no? It's also quite common that they have to sign off on any press and other performances that the act is doing, during the season. If that's the case, then what's all the outrage about?
I'm asking, I honestly don't know.
Is that sure yet?
Tell 'em Ashley! The song is fun and stands on its own, even without the performance. And so what if people enjoy the performance as well? Not to everyone's taste but it's so slick. I enjoy the sauciness of it, and I'm generally Marge Simpson when it comes to pop music.
Yep, that true.
Tomorrow the head of Ukrainian selection will sign a contract with freedom jazz or Kazka.
Hope EBU will ban our country this year, cause it is not serious.