I will not point out how draconian that contract it, that has already been done extensively by everyone in this thread. However, isn't this the same contract the other Ukrainian entrants had to sign, because I suspect that it is. I remember for instance that Svetlana Loboda had to sell her flat to finance her Moscow2009 entry, which she had to do herself. Forcing MARUV to cancel her other gigs sucks because she's an established singer, but again, she KNEW this upon applying to Vidbir AND she agreed to go to Teller Aweave anyway, so.
If it is indeed the same contract, MARUV will have some agency in the decisions, if heavily restricted. The lack of improv isn't necessarily bad. UABC wants to do well, and want to know in advance what they can expect from MARUV. If she wants give Miki a lapdance or blast Sergey Lazarev with a smoke cannon during her performance, don't you think the broadcaster should know in advance? Nobody at Eurovision improvises their performance (with the exception Old Chinpubes, but was the entire point of his performance) because if you do, you probably lack a plan and are destined to fail. That MARUV isn't allowed to do anything she wants is inherently a good thing for her chances. It means her act will be created in concencus with and with the collaboration of the delegation, people who have knowledge AND experience in winning Eurovision. For those who wonder what happens if full agency is passed to the entrant without interference from the delegation, I refer you to Time, A Matter of.
The fines are awful though. Ukraine are such cheapskates for inflicting those upon their own entrants. No wonder ONUKA hasn't done Vidbir yet.
Our country has a tendency of destroying and humiliating talanted people. That's why they look for opportunities abroad, from artists to IT-specialists. The fact we still have so much talent inside means how strong our people against society and corrupted government machine.
Ask any talented, creative person here did he faced humiliation? Hell yes, one hundred of them would say so. Even I have faced big portion of this in school years when I was one of the best students and had success at literature, maths, chemistry etc, also played violin. Now I'm ordinary and completely different but those traumas from the past still influenced my personality...
Bullsh..t What about u??? (((
І це дуже помітно, як ці травми вплинули на твою "особистість."......та свідомість - хто ти є!!! Задай себе этот вопрос.
I wonder who you are and where are you from?)) even u are knowing about plans of Onuka.......
So she's confirmed her participation which is good news, but that contract is ridiculous. Poor lady, hope the EBU step in to support her as she shouldn't have to go through with that contract.
not being allowed to improvise on stage is ridiculous micromanaging and asking maruv to cover all expenses is absurd considering they hosted an NF. maruv has made it there were other points she felt were unfair too. those two you mentioned are indeed not super out of the ordinary (though in my mind people should be able to give interviews at elast).
well, then the contract could be just that. "if your acts as the ukrainian representative incur in fines by the EBU on the channel then you will have to pay them for us". this effectively covers undesired improvisation and most forms of undesired political action.Well, let's look at it from another perspective. Maruv's performance is probably going to be provocative to begin with. Any issues that EBU has with the live performance, if it comes to it, the channel would have to pay the fine. So they probably want to make sure it doesn't come to that.
I'm just trying to look at it from both sides. I don't necessarily think it's anything personal against Maruv by the channel. I could be persuaded with some evidence to the contrary, but so far, I think it's premature to pick up the pitchforks.