Kaja, I do agree with some of your points, but I strongly oppose to your conclusion that people voted for Zala and Gašper only because they voted against Raiven.
And this brings me to one important thing that I feel we should clarify at this point. Raiven is NOT a star in Slovenia. She is an artistic soul with very limited number of fans. Most likely Raiven has bigger following among ESC fans (of which I am most certain that tuorem is the biggest one) than in Slovenia itself. Sorry, I never hear Raiven's music on radio, I never hear she is concerting in Slovenia, and if you show up three times on EMA, it doesn't make you a star!!!! Basically, what I am trying to say is that my impression here is that a lot of Non-Slovenians here think that Raiven is an established brand on Slovenian stage. Well, guys, sorry, but you are wrong.
And for this very reason, Kaja, I disagree with your assessment that people in Slovenia voted against Raiven! People generally perceive as an artist for eclectic tastes and my opinion is that some viewers last night had just this impression that RTV SLO was shoving Raiven down their throat - and judging by Lea Sirk's reaction, this was obviously the intention. My opinion is that RTV SLO was convinced that people would choose Raiven if they put her in the superfinal against some weak act, however, they couldn't pick Fed Horses, for instance, because that would be too obvious for people. Anyways, I was rooting for Zala and Gašper from the beginning, and I voted for them, and I certainly don't think they won only because people have something against Raiven.
I hope that this clarification sheds some light on our EMA selection and why Raiven was not chosen to represent us. But on the other hand, Kaja is preaching gospel when saying that Zala and Gašper were both shook when declared winners