Scorpion
Active member
I fixed my votes as well.
And I think this was very unfair!
And I think this was very unfair!
So many people changing their votes, ! I bet Tohru would've qualified.
Sorry but I don't really get all the hate on the decision about Tohru.
The decision was the only possible decision that could have been made according the rules if I see it correctly.
Maybe the rules should be changed or cases like this should be added to them (maybe let it stay in the contest, but without the chance to prequalify for the next NSC and/or win the current contest) but the issue was dealt with accordingly with regards to the rules as they are right now and apply to NSC 57.
Sorry but I don't really get all the hate on the decision about Tohru.
The decision was the only possible decision that could have been made according the rules if I see it correctly.
Maybe the rules should be changed or cases like this should be added to them (maybe let it stay in the contest, but without the chance to prequalify for the next NSC and/or win the current contest) but the issue was dealt with accordingly with regards to the rules as they are right now and apply to NSC 57.
^sry didn't see your question!
The most fair thing we could come up with, was that the ones that doesn't change in time will not have 1 pointer. It is cause the hosts can't move the deadline any further and has to go on with the final right after the semi results. This was also decided on the discussion, even if we missed to point that out earlier.
LEFT TO VOTE:
Zechonia