ESC United Mod Team
Super Moderator
- Joined
- February 10, 2021
- Posts
- 214
juries don’t give a fuck about betting odds
Well I’m glad you already have prepared something to blame if Germany doesn’t do well. Correlation isn’t causality. I’ve presented some arguments based on facts, seems like you can’t go anywhere from ”well it’s my opinion so I’m right”There's still a clear influence for me, especially last year and before. But opinions may vary
ESCunited has become such tinfoil hat territory. Explain:lol juries basically chose their top 10 in the past years almost ONLY based on the top 10 betting odds!
Of course they are massively influenced by the betting odds.
I always find it funny how these right wingers think they're in the position to judge what is and is not normal aka should be accepted or not. As if they own the society. If these people are the norm then I rather be not normal. This makes me love them even more!Frauke Petry (AFD) doesn't like our entry. I would say: we have done everything right!
Especially when they decide to clutch their pearls over something that has been around for decades.I always find it funny how these right wingers think they're in the position to judge what is and is not normal aka should be accepted or not. As if they own the society. If these people are the norm then I rather be not normal. This makes me love them even more!
Explain:
Official Channel:
Yes, one example per year. Because each year there is one jury winner and one betting odds winner, dumbass. I can't highlight 16 jury winners or that a song that was 17th in the odds got 14th with the juries. I'd like to see you come up with ONE example of the juries not liking a song in a semi and then suddenly liking it because it got better odds before the finaleWhoo. One example per year. That changes everything. /s
Yes, one example per year. Because each year there is one jury winner and one betting odds winner, dumbass. I can't highlight 16 jury winners or that a song that was 17th in the odds got 14th with the juries. I'd like to see you come up with ONE example of the juries not liking a song in a semi and then suddenly liking it because it got better odds before the finale
OMG under the video someone wrote a comment I had to laugh about:Official Channel:
lol juries basically chose their top 10 in the past years almost ONLY based on the top 10 betting odds!
Of course they are massively influenced by the betting odds.
If you compare the jury and the televote of the past ten years then - with a few (!) exceptions - the jury sticked way closer to the betting odds than the audience.
They are playing safe, of course. How can the jurors explain why they voted for a song way down in the odds, especially with their names being published? People would accuse them of manipulation for not voting for the favourites. They are much too afraid to vote for anything far beyond the top ten, with EXCEPTIONS of course if a song is especially jury friendly, like North Macedonia for example.
Yes, one example per year. Because each year there is one jury winner and one betting odds winner, dumbass. I can't highlight 16 jury winners or that a song that was 17th in the odds got 14th with the juries. I'd like to see you come up with ONE example of the juries not liking a song in a semi and then suddenly liking it because it got better odds before the finale
Well I’m glad you already have prepared something to blame if Germany doesn’t do well. Correlation isn’t causality. I’ve presented some arguments based on facts, seems like you can’t go anywhere from ”well it’s my opinion so I’m right”