Contact us

ESC 2019 General Discussion Thread

DenizESC

Banned
Joined
July 12, 2014
Posts
4,120
Location
A Mhar
I agree that the new system is better however I also agree with Grinch that I enjoyed the long and extra dramatic way of presenting the votes more than the current rushed feeling one, which is I think what she mean't. I miss ':8: points to...'

Tbh I even loved when they announced 1-7 points :D
 

Citelis

Well-known member
Joined
March 18, 2016
Posts
8,307
Location
Athens
I read somewhere that maybe the votes 1-10 of juries will appear one by one while the spokesperson says hello and then the sokeperson will say only the 12 points! However i have no idea how true it is!
 

Ausesken

Well-known member
Joined
February 14, 2017
Posts
4,549
Location
Catalonia
I read somewhere that maybe the votes 1-10 of juries will appear one by one while the spokesperson says hello and then the sokeperson will say only the 12 points! However i have no idea how true it is!

If they keep shortening it, within some years there won't even be a spokesperson :lol: announce the winner and bye bye
 

Brandt

Well-known member
Joined
December 27, 2014
Posts
3,203
My only problem with the current voting system is that the spokespersons reveal the jury votes which is I am the least interested about. I am more curious to see how public voted rather than how 5 specific people rated them. Give us juries as how televote is given, and I would be fine.
 

Citelis

Well-known member
Joined
March 18, 2016
Posts
8,307
Location
Athens
If they keep shortening it, within some years there won't even be a spokesperson :lol: announce the winner and bye bye

That change wouldn't shorten it actually! More likely it would help people to follow better the voting of juries! Instead of showing the votes 1-10 just appearing in the screen they would show them one by one!
 

DenizESC

Banned
Joined
July 12, 2014
Posts
4,120
Location
A Mhar
My only problem with the current voting system is that the spokespersons reveal the jury votes which is I am the least interested about. I am more curious to see how public voted rather than how 5 specific people rated them. Give us juries as how televote is given, and I would be fine.

Oh yea, agree with this also! Don't understand who thought it was fun to present juries with spokesperson lol nobody gives a f :lol:
 

Clinty

Member
Joined
January 22, 2019
Posts
163
Location
My heart lives in San Marino
idk why they can't just add another 15-20 minutes to the runtime and have the spokespeople do the top three separately again. what's an extra 15 minutes when the show already goes for like 15 hours anyway
 

Brandt

Well-known member
Joined
December 27, 2014
Posts
3,203
Oh yea, agree with this also! Don't understand who thought it was fun to present juries with spokesperson lol nobody gives a f :lol:

It was likely because it is easier to arrange since jury votes are given one day prior to the live contest and the EBU team has an entire 40 minutes to arrange televote while the jury votes are revealed. But before 2016, we never had problems with combination of the votes in a short span of time. It is not supposed to be impossible to do it that way either.
 

HayashiM

Veteran
Joined
January 26, 2019
Posts
4,321
Location
Prague, Czech Republic
It was likely because it is easier to arrange since jury votes are given one day prior to the live contest and the EBU team has an entire 40 minutes to arrange televote while the jury votes are revealed. But before 2016, we never had problems with combination of the votes in a short span of time. It is not supposed to be impossible to do it that way either.

I would be really surprised if this part wasn't pretty much entirely automated. Basically I think you can be shown the results a few seconds after the votes stop. Let's put an inteval act in as a doublecheck/arrangement of order time and they should be fine to go.
 

GRE

Well-known member
Joined
December 6, 2010
Posts
8,195
Location
Greece
I don't know where I should put this,
so I leave it here.
It's a map showing which countries that have done better in the jury vote and which countries that have done better in the televote in since 2010.
D2wIMQaX4AEJMmn.jpg

https://twitter.com/ESCNation/status/1111272296084373504
:au::mt::sl::ge::at::al: are the top 5 with juries,
while :ru::pl::tr::ro::ua: are the top 5 with televoting.
:cz::ba::pt::me::fi: are the most neutral countries.
 

Ianp16

Well-known member
Joined
April 15, 2015
Posts
800
Location
Manchester
I am fascinated by stuff like this ^^^^^^

It's clear that eastern Europe either try harder or get a better neighbourly vote - or a combination. The big five... LOL
 

Realest

Well-known member
Joined
May 23, 2017
Posts
7,789
Location
Germany
If many western Country had the Same Votingpower like the Eastern Countries and the other way Round, the Differences wouldnt be that strong.
 

Realest

Well-known member
Joined
May 23, 2017
Posts
7,789
Location
Germany
According to Oiko:

When the jury voting is complete, the hosts start the public voting announcement. The voting announcement will commence announcing the points the 26th country in the jury voting received. Then they will announced thee public voting for the 25th country and so on!

So instead of announcing the 26th country in tele voting, the announcement will begin with the points that the actual 26th country (in the jury voting) has!
 

Clinty

Member
Joined
January 22, 2019
Posts
163
Location
My heart lives in San Marino
that map doesn't really take points into account though. A difference between 20th and 25th might only be a few points, but a difference between 3rd and 8th could be as much as 100 or so points.
 

Pawhlen

Active member
Joined
June 9, 2013
Posts
2,980
Location
Eksjö
According to Oiko:

When the jury voting is complete, the hosts start the public voting announcement. The voting announcement will commence announcing the points the 26th country in the jury voting received. Then they will announced thee public voting for the 25th country and so on!

So instead of announcing the 26th country in tele voting, the announcement will begin with the points that the actual 26th country (in the jury voting) has!

Interesting, but I wonder if the general public will understand the procedure
 

JChan

Well-known member
Joined
June 13, 2016
Posts
2,071
I like the change, as long as it's not a massive blowout it guarantees that we'll get an exciting result.
 

Pawhlen

Active member
Joined
June 9, 2013
Posts
2,980
Location
Eksjö
I like the change, as long as it's not a massive blowout it guarantees that we'll get an exciting result.

It would have backfired completely last year, since :at: and :se: neither got many televoting points, which means that it would have been decided before the last votes are announced.

So, this change, if it´s true is not good at all, since the climax can occur even when 5-6 countries are still waiting for their score

With the current procedure in place since 2016, the winner will always be determined in the absolute last moment during the voting which many wants, at least if you look on this forum prior years
 

anto475

Well-known member
Joined
January 18, 2012
Posts
2,583
Location
Dublin/Galway
I would have preferred the old way. Shocks like Poland 2016 were a lot more fun than keeping it safe like this. Still, maybe it'll be for the best.
 
Top Bottom