GermanBango
Well-known member
maybe everyone cheated?
Well, my bet is that they would be better investigating and reacting if none of them were corrupt themselves. I'm not saying all of EBU are corrupt, obviously not, but sure some of them are.
Well, that was some years ago, they even got a fine by EBU (a ridiculously low one)... but had EBU followed their own rules they would have got a 5 year ban instead... I guess money really pays off in the end
Are you referring to the incident where Azerbaijani officials interrogated the people who voted for Armenia? They technically didn't block the lines, the issue with that is a bit more complicated cause it was the government interviewing the individuals and not the broadcaster. But since that incident additional rules and guidelines have been implemented to (hopefully) prevent this from happening again.
Matt if you mean this fake Lithuanian video about Azerbaijan, better not make me laugh
Matt if you mean this fake Lithuanian video about Azerbaijan, better not make me laugh
Matt if you mean this fake Lithuanian video about Azerbaijan, better not make me laugh
Don't get me wrong here but you seem to be biased.
Matt if you mean this fake Lithuanian video about Azerbaijan, better not make me laugh
yes, Azerbaijan paid me for it
yes, Azerbaijan paid me for it
me too
yes, Azerbaijan paid me for it
How much cash did you get? I need some extra income too
Next year I'll be going around town here in Sweden handing out cell-cards with one dialable number
whatever
As usual your source failed to prove your claim. You claimed that 46 people were arrested. That source claims "a number of people [...] were questioned". Only 43 people voted for Armenia, so a maximum of 43 people could've been questioned.
I have no clue what you're talking about. I don't follow sports. And it has nothing to do with what I wrote.guys,are u surprised?that's the way azery win the top places,and not only in eurovision,remember the scandal for buying golden olympiad.they are at pains to represent their land as they could-with the help of the petrol money.way to go.they are not the only a guilty side,europe also their accomplice,on closing eyes to their cheatings
But clearly you can trust a shady video posted by a random webpage.This is crap, they did not say '' you shall vote in the semi final '' they said '' we also did it in the semi final ''.
And you can't trust Ictamai TV.
It's not a poor choice of words when the two have completely different meanings. Nobody said there was nothing wrong with it. But claiming that 46 people were arrested when 43 people might have been questioned (remember, 43 people voted[/] for Armenia. The article does not state that every single one of them were brought in for questioning) is just plain lying.Oh sorry for the poor choice of words, 43 people get questioned by the police because they voted in a television song contest. Yeah, nothing wrong here.
Because 39 countries received high points...Oh please, just getting high points don't mean cheating you fool, if so 39 countries was cheating this year.
It's not really Azerbaijan's fault, nor does it mean that they're cheating, though.And you think that everything's right with this?
You're arguing with a guy whose response to me asking for proof of his false accusations against Azerbaijan was "Do you have any proof they didn't cheat?!"The expression "maybe they did" is not a valid argument.
Maybe Barack Obama is an alien
Maybe Russians killed Kenny
Maybe Daenerys Targaryen is a transgender dude
Maybe we are living in a matrix
None of these statements are impossible. Ergo they must be true
In case you didn't notice, this is a general thread not, a thread focusing specifically on Azerbaijan. Most of the people wondering aloud about all of the ex-Yugoslavian countries giving Denmark such high points (while mostly snubbing Ukraine and Azerbaijan) haven't actually defending Azerbaijan in any way. One of them even joked Azerbaijan and Armenia should both be banned from the Eurovision Song Contest.Well, I think there's better way to defend Azerbaijan rather than trying to send the crap somewhere else, saying that Denmark bought the Ex-Yugo votes, etc... That's ridiculous.
Why the heck would Azerbaijan send Russian-speaking agents to Lithuania?As I said, this doesn't look good and should be investigated. That's the only way to find the true.
Why hello there, pot. Stop calling the kettle black.Stop playing the victim here
A lot of the votes were weird this year. Russia giving Ukraine a single point was shocking.The Plot thickens it seems
Eurovision: Azerbaijan probes Russian 'nul points'
Why? The article simply states that according to televoting data and the jury votes, Russia should've gotten Azerbaijan's 10, yet they got nothing, so something is amiss.Yes I post a similar article in the Russia thread after someone from Azerbaijan was shocked they gave Russia no points. Of course everyone is using it as an example of how corrupt the East are and Azerbaijan should be kicked out.
Here for those who didn't see: APA - Director of Public Television issues statement on counting of Azerbaijani audience?s votes for Russia?s representative
According to the article, there wasn't a problem with the televoting. Russia allegedly had strong support from the televoters, as well. The combined result should've given Russia 10 points, yet something went wrong. I think they're alleging hacking.First of all, if it is true that they got 10 points that were not counted.... that means there was some problem with the televoting, right? So why didn't they use th jury instead? That's happened before.
That's the system currently in use (introduced this year)...Some changes I believe that could make some difference are;
- Televoting and Juryvoting in each country to rank all of the performances - 25 points to their favourite and 1 point to their least favourite. Add the two sets of points together, with the top 12 performances receiving that country's points.
It would also be patently unfair against smaller countries. And bigger countries. Russia would always be at a disadvantage because any entry they give what will be the new 12, 10 and 8 points to would get a ton of points. If they're a candidate for the crown along with Russia, Russia may inadvertently doom their own chances even if that country gives Russia the same "level" of points in return because a "12" from Russia might be worth 4 times as much as a "12" from, say, Ukraine.The best way to minimise block voting would be a proportional vote system which weighs to vote of countries according to their population. Obviously this system is pretty hard to implement but it would almost nullify block voting as a vote from Britain, Italy or France would count as much as the votings from the whole Balkan block together.
1) I can find no sources for your 1st claim. Azerbaijan apparently blurred out the Armenian singer's number in 2009. They were not accused of blocking the line, however.I mean how come Azerbaijan got away with blocking lines for the Armenian entry for instance? Lebanon were banned PRIOR the contest for wanting to do something similar, but what happened with Azerbaijan? Some small fine and that was it...
why you deleted that wrote first?
1) I can find no sources for your 1st claim. Azerbaijan apparently blurred out the Armenian singer's number in 2009. They were not accused of blocking the line, however.
2) Lebanon was not banned for blocking any phone lines or planning to block any phone lines. They were banned for stating that they would refuse to air the Israeli entry because Lebanese laws forbade them to. An entire thing altogether. The rules of the contest states that you have to air the final and the semi-final you participate in in their entirety (in 2005, there was only one semi-final, so he rules back then stated that you had the air the final and the (only) semi-final in their entirety).