Contact us

Bringing back the language rule!

A-lister

Veteran
Joined
December 28, 2009
Posts
32,825
A lot of people dont, but more people have English has a first, second, third or subsequent language in Europe than any other, so more people in Russia for example will understand a Croatian entry if it's in English rather than Croatian. For me, lyrics are one half of the song and I do like to relate to them, I cant do that if I dont understand what's being sung. But like you point out, I do still like songs that arent in English and often songs are more suited to their native language, particularly if they are made/produced by a person of that individual country.
But there shouldnt be any language rule because it removes the freedom of broadcasters and artists to come up with a song they truly want. They shouldnt be forced into singing in English and they shouldnt be forced into singing a native language.

But English isnt a problem at Eurovision. It is my country's language and my culture so I am proud of it, some people (not you though) talk it down and I dont think that's fair. Not all Eurovision entries are in English, a non-English song won in 2007 so I dont know what the problem is. I can understand if my country constantly sent a song in another language it may not be my favourite thing so I know where you're all coming from, but to remove the choice would be wrong imo.

More Russians would understand English than Croatian? Firstly a majority of Russians do not even speak English so naturally they would understand atleast bits of Croatian more since it's the same language group.

Who talks down on English language or anglo-saxic culture? No one talks down, we just want Europe to be represented by all Europe and not just a bit of it. It is you who promote use of English in Eurovision. The only ignorance I can find is that Eurovision has to be in English or follow in the footstep of Anglo-saxic culture alone. I don't think people have anything against English, it's just that Eurovision should be about representing all Europe and there's more to Europe than just English or "Anglo-saxic" inspired songs (American-styled for instance).

And as I written in my last post I understand partly the lyrics argument, but then again I don't, because Eurovision was never a contest about "great lyrics" and it is still not and not even the English speaking nations can come up with entries with decent lyrics, so how can the non-English nation do that?
 
Last edited:

MyHeartIsYours

Well-known member
Joined
May 22, 2010
Posts
24,545
More Russians would understand English than Croatian? Firstly a majority of Russians do not even speak English so naturally they would understand atleast bits of Croatian more since it's the same language group.
The majority of Russians dont speak English, yes you're probably right, but my point is that English is the main foreign language spoken in Russian and so more Russians would understand a song in English than say Croatian, Greek or Danish, for example. I dont think that being part of the same language group as any affect on people's knowledge, my language is Germanic, in the same group as German, Dutch, Icelandic, if you stood up in front of me and spoke to me in any of these I wouldnt have a clue what you're talking about bar the odd word which would be a guess.

Who talks down on English language or anglo-saxic culture? No one talks down, we just want Europe to be represented by all Europe and not just a bit of it. It is you who promote use of English in Eurovision. The only ignorance I can find is that Eurovision has to be in English or follow in the footstep of Anglo-saxic culture alone.
Okay I think I misunderstood, sorry. I see it from the perspective of that I regard all languages and cultures as equal and that even the 'dominant' culture is somebody's heritage and it shouldnt be looked upon as a fault. I dont promote the use of English at Eurovision, I say it is my personal preference to be able to relate to the lyrics and that countries should be given the choice to sing in whichever language they choose.
 

A-lister

Veteran
Joined
December 28, 2009
Posts
32,825
Im not talking about countries historic cultures, they're obviously extremely diverse. Im talking about their everyday cultures, the way people go about the lives, the cafes they go to, the shops they shop at, the music they listen to, the films they watch, the tv they like, etc. I could work around Switzerland, Spain or Germany and I could just as well be in the UK, Sweden or the USA. Apart from the obvious differences (linguistic, climate, architecture), Western Europe is under the cultural dominance of the United States, whether you choose to call that Anglo-Saxon culture or whatever that's up to you. But it's true. The United Kingdom is in a bit of a different position because of the fact that British-American culture is virtually the same with just a few differences but we are still under the influence of the US and would be even more so if we did not have their culture already as our own.

So just because we are under influence Eurovision should not be open to some alternative? It has to turn into some American wannabe contest? Anglovision? Sorry but I just don't agree with that. Eventhough countries are getting more and more alike, there are still things worth keeping and encourage.

Eastern Europe is slightly different yes, but the reason for that is a legacy of the Cold War. The generation of Eastern Europeans my age are following a similar pattern as Western Europe and so English is becoming much more widely known. I dont know where you get the fourth of fifth language from, German is spoken by more Europeans than English as a first language yes but not in total. For most countries, except in a few circumstances, English is the second language and is the most taught foreign language in education. And in countries like the UK with English as the first language, it is French which is the second language, not German. And Russian is much less known in Western Europe than English is in Eastern Europe.

As someone with a background in Eastern Europe and been traveling around there and having relatives I can assure you English is not yet even second language in many parts, German is still the second most known language in countries like for instance Poland, Czech Republic and others.

Anyways, to me Eurovision was never about the "superior" to show of, but rather all diversities being shown. It was this concept that made it unique and exceptional.


Why are you trying to make things up like that? I've never said anything of the sort, I've stated fact. Im not asking anybody to obey and as far as Im aware, the UK delegation hasnt asked anybody to obey them at Eurovision either! In fact, countries are making the choice of their own, and you are asking them to obey your opinion by forcing them to sing in a particular language ;).

As I said I'm not pro-forcing, but I do see problems with what's happening to the contest today. I think all voices that are pro "Americanization" or "Anglofication" of the contest are indeed spreading a view that that's "superior" and therefor "better", and I simply don''t agree with this view because that was never what Eurovision was about in the first place.


The EU is breaking down borders and trying to take away sovereignty and culture, but they're not trying to replace it with AngloSaxon culture! They hate us! :lol: They're trying to turn it Franco-German. What EBU is in fact doing is giving countries the free choice of which language they want to sing in, if the countries themselves choose to sing in English, then that is not the problem of the EBU's, is it?

I am not sure exactly what EU is trying to do, but my point is still that they try to erase national characteristics in favor of something else, and Eurovision is also heading in that direction and in the case of Eurovision it's clear that that "something else" means an Anglo-saxic/American approach generally.

Exactly, so why do you think it's such a big deal if countries sing in English or not?

I think my opinion is quite clear on this. The bid deal is that it's killing European diversity which to me is what made this contest unique in the first place.

The whole concept was to bring Europe together, to unite people through music after some terrible years and to try and lighten the mood for one day a year (the 1950's were extremely tough for people, it's not like the war just ended and it was all rosy). The concept was shown once again when Russia joined but I feel that the concept is being challenged now by other reasons and factors, the use of English not being one of them.

Exactly! So how come bringing a continent together mean a whole continent adopting just one language and cultural approach? That to me is not bringing together.

If you believe in a language rule then you are talking about forcing countries to sing in certain languages. Nobody's suggested English superiority, it may be a preference but it is a preference established by native countries themselves (Sweden for example nearly always sings in English, that doesnt mean your entries are any better or any worse than if they were in Swedish, it just means that your broadcaster made a choice about which language they preferred).

As I stated I am not pro-forcing native language use, but I think the juries should have this in mind in their voting and encourage it atleast. As for Sweden I always said I wanted us to send something Swedish, but also it does reflect pretty well other Swedish issues and I doubt we'll ever see an entry in Swedish and it's sad.

I dont think so, that has been the general trend of world culture in the global village. I think the erosion of individual cultures is very sad (I know the way Welsh culture used to be treated here for example, Im glad that it is now on the rebound) but singing in English is not eroding one's culture, as I said earlier, the style of music has a much stronger link with culture than the language of the lyrics.

But I am not just discussing the languages, I discuss style aswell. Juries are biased AGAINST local-styled entries aswell, this is what I mean with the contest turning "Anglo-saxic".
 
Last edited:

A-lister

Veteran
Joined
December 28, 2009
Posts
32,825
The majority of Russians dont speak English, yes you're probably right, but my point is that English is the main foreign language spoken in Russian and so more Russians would understand a song in English than say Croatian, Greek or Danish, for example. I dont think that being part of the same language group as any affect on people's knowledge, my language is Germanic, in the same group as German, Dutch, Icelandic, if you stood up in front of me and spoke to me in any of these I wouldnt have a clue what you're talking about bar the odd word which would be a guess.

I mean that a Russian that do NOT understand much English or any English at all (and there's alot of them) would still probably atleast get some Croatian. I'm not saying they would understand it though, but atleast get parts of it if we're on the subject of "understanding lyrics".

I'm not denying English is the universal language, but it's not the second language YET in parts as you're trying to point out. Russia is one example and as I pointed out even German is more known in many of the former communist/USSR countries than English.

Okay I think I misunderstood, sorry. I see it from the perspective of that I regard all languages and cultures as equal and that even the 'dominant' culture is somebody's heritage and it shouldnt be looked upon as a fault. I dont promote the use of English at Eurovision, I say it is my personal preference to be able to relate to the lyrics and that countries should be given the choice to sing in whichever language they choose.

I understand completely where you're coming from and the thing is I agree, but that's my whole point that the languages and cultures should be looked upon as equal in this, and therefor embraced, and I feel it's not.

I agree with the choice part, but I still think one can relate to a song without actually understanding the lyrics, and again I think the whole lyrics thing is exaggerated because most songs are clichéd about love and peace anyways lol.
 
Last edited:

MyHeartIsYours

Well-known member
Joined
May 22, 2010
Posts
24,545
So just because we are under influence Eurovision should not be open to some alternative? It has to turn into some American wannabe contest? Anglovision? Sorry but I just don't agree with that. Eventhough countries are getting more and more alike, there are still things worth keeping and encourage.
It should be open to alternative and it is by saying that countries can sing in any language they wish - and they do, hence why there are many entries still in native languages.

Anyways, to me Eurovision was never about the "superior" to show of, but rather all diversities being shown. It was this concept that made it unique and exceptional.
Because countries choose to sing in English doesnt mean that English is superior, it means that it is the most popular because it is the most understood language overall in Europe, that's all.

As I said I'm not pro-forcing, but I do see problems with what's happening to the contest today. I think all voices that are pro "Americanization" or "Anglofication" of the contest are indeed spreading a view that that's "superior" and therefor "better", and I simply don''t agree with this view because that was never what Eurovision was about in the first place.
But how do you propose to stop English-use then? A language rule is the only way it could be done in my opinion.
And I dont think that pro-Americanisation or Anglofication people are saying that it's superior, Im not. Im saying I prefer it because I understand it better.

I am not sure exactly what EU is trying to do, but my point is still that they try to erase national characteristics in favor of something else, and Eurovision is also heading in that direction and in the case of Eurovision it's clear that that "something else" means an Anglo-saxic/American approach generally.
Eurovision isnt because it's given a choice for broadcasters, if the broadcasters choose English, it's not Eurovision's 'fault'.

Exactly! So how come bringing a continent together mean a whole continent adopting just one language and cultural approach? That to me is not bringing together.
It's bringing it together in that other countries feel comfortable to sing in another country's language and that countries are given a free choice. That's my view anyway.

As I stated I am not pro-forcing native language use, but I think the juries should have this in mind in their voting and encourage it atleast. As for Sweden I always said I wanted us to send something Swedish, but also it does reflect pretty well other Swedish issues and I doubt we'll ever see an entry in Swedish and it's sad.
So you think that it should be a category of the Juries criteria when they're voting? That's not very fair. What if say for instance Cyprus wants to sing in English, a language that 75% of people their speak as a native language, but because it's a non-official language they should be marked down?
And with Sweden, when your songs come on I dont think oh this doesnt sound Swedish, or deserve to do as well as a song that is in Swedish. I think Swedish entries are very distinctive (in that you could always guess it was from your country) even though you sing in English.

But I am not just discussing the languages, I discuss style aswell. Juries are biased AGAINST local-styled entries aswell, this is what I mean with the contest turning "Anglo-saxic".
I dont think they are, in any case they are more pro-native languages than the televoters. It is the televoters who after all are the focus of the songs being in English. I think you misunderstand the fact that English songs apparently do better in the results; the reason for that is that there are more English songs to do better, it's not because the Juries are against native languages.
 

seb89

Active member
Joined
October 16, 2010
Posts
4,695
Location
Antwerp/BXL
In general: cultures are dying??? It depends on what you see as culture of course (small culture <> large culture, etc.)... but euhm... ever taken a course in Intercultural communication? Or ever heard of the "convention of cultural diversity" or Geert Hofstede (http://www.geert-hofstede.com/)??

A lot of people dont, but more people have English has a first, second, third or subsequent language in Europe than any other, so more people in Russia for example will understand a Croatian entry if it's in English rather than Croatian. For me, lyrics are one half of the song and I do like to relate to them, I cant do that if I dont understand what's being sung. But like you point out, I do still like songs that arent in English and often songs are more suited to their native language, particularly if they are made/produced by a person of that individual country.
But there shouldnt be any language rule because it removes the freedom of broadcasters and artists to come up with a song they truly want. They shouldnt be forced into singing in English and they shouldnt be forced into singing a native language.

But English isnt a problem at Eurovision. It is my country's language and my culture so I am proud of it, some people (not you though) talk it down and I dont think that's fair. Not all Eurovision entries are in English, a non-English song won in 2007 so I dont know what the problem is. I can understand if my country constantly sent a song in another language it may not be my favourite thing so I know where you're all coming from, but to remove the choice would be wrong imo.

You are looking of course from your own cultural perspective :D. Like you said English music industry is popular over the whole world, so you are used to hear songs in English and understand them. I'm used to hear songs in other languages than Dutch, so maybe that's why I would like it to be more diverse (tbh a Welsh song from the UK, would be awesome though :D).

Like you said removing the choice would be wrong, I kinda agree. But the EBU should certainly promote sending songs in their native languages. Well if a country selects an entry in English, no problems for me, but slecting a song in a native language and at the end translating it into English, is wrong imo.
 

Yamarus

Active member
Joined
May 19, 2011
Posts
2,053
Location
Brussels
I'm just making a wild assumption here, but I think that if the ESC becomes an even bigger commercial event, we will inevitably end up with a Contest in which almost all participants sing in English (which is already the case to a large extent - ESC 2011 had 36 English entries out of 43). Although I'm not per se against that, I think that it would be nice to see the EBU develop a parallel contest, smaller in scale and scope, where local music and languages would be promoted.
 

A-lister

Veteran
Joined
December 28, 2009
Posts
32,825
I'm just making a wild assumption here, but I think that if the ESC becomes an even bigger commercial event, we will inevitably end up with a Contest in which almost all participants sing in English (which is already the case to a large extent - ESC 2011 had 36 English entries out of 43). Although I'm not per se against that, I think that it would be nice to see the EBU develop a parallel contest, smaller in scale and scope, where local music and languages would be promoted.

Hmm I don't believe in the parallel solution, I think EBU need to recognize Eurovision's exceptionalism and pay respect to the original idea. I think there need to be a compromise and a balance between the commercial aspect on one hand and the "representing countries" aspect on the other. I think it worked well up until the juries comeback 3 years ago. We had songs that managed good positions that either had a combination of local sounds and modern contemporary music and/-or in native languages aswell. Now anything which is remotely local or out of the box struggles, and I don't think it's because of the viewers because they can't have changed their voting patterns that drastically in just 3 years.

I think there's room for both and I believe the juries can play a part in this and they should imo.

To answer MyHeartIsYours's response above; I don't know what solution would be best with the juries, but I disagree with you and I think they SHOULD pay attention to these matters. I mean why do we have the juries in the first place then? They better play an important role or else they could rather be kicked out. If they are only in there to balance the biasism and help some Western/unlucky countries to achieve better results or transform the contest into "just another Idol...", then they are not really doing anything for the contest.
 
Last edited:

AlekS

Veteran
Joined
October 1, 2009
Posts
26,935
Location
Ukraine
It has to turn into some American wannabe contest?
There's no "Americanization" @ ESC, American culture is not bad (like any other one) and ESC is not a nazi contest (Europe for Europeans?) Europe is multi-cultural xshrug Europe is Paki, Europe is Indian, Europe is American, Europe is European.


But I am not just discussing the languages, I discuss style aswell. Juries are biased AGAINST local-styled entries aswell, this is what I mean with the contest turning "Anglo-saxic".
Then how on Earth this global conspiration (*drama*) allowed Bosnian entry, how did they put commercial/mainstream song on the last place?
Why calling them biased without any single valuable proof?
 

AlekS

Veteran
Joined
October 1, 2009
Posts
26,935
Location
Ukraine
As for English and non-English songs.

I don't suffer on discrimination so I don't care. It's not nationalistic contest.
What bothers me is that people attack the juries when it's actually also about televoters who choose songs in English on their NFs. Are they biased too?
If I like a song in English I won't allow any badmouthing and discriminative xenophobic stuff against me, thanks.
 

A-lister

Veteran
Joined
December 28, 2009
Posts
32,825
There's no "Americanization" @ ESC, American culture is not bad (like any other one) and ESC is not a nazi contest (Europe for Europeans?) Europe is multi-cultural xshrug Europe is Paki, Europe is Indian, Europe is American, Europe is European.

You certainly didn't get my point. I'm not anti-American or anti-English. English is my second language and I have friends and relatives living in both the USA and the UK, and I visited both at times.

Who was talking about nazi? So now celebrating European diversity is "nazi"? The concept of the contest is what it is and I guess it all comes down to personal taste and how one interprets it. I interpret this contest as it was created; songs representing countries (not the other way) and a way of letting Europe get-together.

Seeing nazi in my comments is jut too much really, then it's misunderstood by purpose. :? And the whole xenophobia thing is such an exaggerate I won't even comment on such statements.
 
Last edited:

r3gg13

Well-known member
Joined
December 23, 2010
Posts
10,263
Location
Westchester - Los Angeles
Who was talking about nazi? So now celebrating European diversity is "nazi"?

I don't think anyone mentioned anything about Nazis. Comparing celebration of European diversity to anything "Nazi" does not make much logical sense. Please refrain and be careful with your statements
 

A-lister

Veteran
Joined
December 28, 2009
Posts
32,825
I don't think anyone mentioned anything about Nazis. Comparing celebration of European diversity to anything "Nazi" does not make much logical sense. Please refrain and be careful with your statements

This comment was a response to the comment made to me. I didn't ever say anything like that and I find it disturbing how someone could accuse my views in such way.

The comment I answered to was a dig at what I've written previously, and not a nice one at all. It's a personal attack and I still find it weird how some are allowed to say such things or draw such falsely conclusions about others' opinions just because they happen to have another opinion. It makes it really difficult to even express a simple opinion on here.
 
Last edited:

AlekS

Veteran
Joined
October 1, 2009
Posts
26,935
Location
Ukraine
The comment I answered to was a dig at what I've written previously...
Really? Or you'll use your eyes and notice that I was speaking for myself? :lol:
I think that discriminating entries (by language) is a nazi concept, that's my opinion.
 

A-lister

Veteran
Joined
December 28, 2009
Posts
32,825
Really? Or you'll use your eyes and notice that I was speaking for myself? :lol:
I think that discriminating entries (by language) is a nazi concept, that's my opinion.

Who is discriminating anything/anyone really? According to this illogic Eurovision has always been a "nazi-contest" then.
 

AlekS

Veteran
Joined
October 1, 2009
Posts
26,935
Location
Ukraine
You certainly didn't get my point. I'm not anti-American or anti-English.
It has to turn into some American wannabe contest?
Not even gonna bother to read what's next after that.
ESC is already too diverse and it's about freedom of choice, doesn't matter if some styles dominate or not.
 

A-lister

Veteran
Joined
December 28, 2009
Posts
32,825
Not even gonna bother to read what's next after that.
ESC is already too diverse and it's about freedom of choice, doesn't matter if some styles dominate or not.

So saying something turning wannabe American is the same as being "anti-American"? Well that's not what it means.

Freedom of choice or catering to the taste of juries? Anyways that's another discussion...
 

AlekS

Veteran
Joined
October 1, 2009
Posts
26,935
Location
Ukraine
So saying something turning wannabe American is the same as being "anti-American"? Well that's not what it means.

Freedom of choice or catering to the taste of juries? Anyways that's another discussion...
and here we go an old tale about juries...

yep, it's anti-American, it bothers you otherwise you wouldn't have mentioned that xshrug
Also I don't get how on Earth it's about pleasing the juries if it doesn't differ from televoters' taste that much.
Not only the juries, televoters also choose these songs ...

I don't think that by refusing from the juries you'll make it more diverse or more fair. Televoters also choose songs in English or songs from different cultures.
 
Last edited:

A-lister

Veteran
Joined
December 28, 2009
Posts
32,825
and here we go an old tale about juries...

yep, it's anti-American, it bothers you otherwise you wouldn't have mentioned that xshrug
Also I don't get how on Earth it's about pleasing the juries if it doesn't differ from televoters' taste that much.
Not only the juries, televoters also choose these songs ...

I don't think that by refusing from the juries you'll make it more diverse or more fair.

It bothers me simply because I think Europe has more to offer and although I've got nothing against the USA, I don't think we need yet another concept which is just sounding like anything else. There need to be room for different stuff, that doesn't make one "anti".

I think it does differ actually, problem is that the songs are changing to also cater to juries' taste and we end up with not much to chose from imo. Because now countries also have to cater to the juries, it eventually leads to televoters voting for "the same stuff", but that's just because we get less and less of diversity because it seems juries prefer some stuff over the rest.
 
Top Bottom