Oh, wouldn't mind that lol its too big anyway. But they wouldn't withdraw in any case because Eurovision is like the Olympics to many countries.
I think Sweden should choose its place first, get first pick, and then the Big 5.
But why? Where is the justification for it? You don't have a leg to stand on in this argument.
Oh, and those small countries you talk about, yes ESC is big to them, but they wouldn't stay in a contest that would be openly corrupt, which is what you are advocating. Oh, and since you are comparing ESC to the Olympics, why don't we just give the athletes from more "important" countries a 1 second head start in the 100 metres sprint?
My problem with you is that you don't care about Eurovision. You only care about the UK getting a good result, regardless of the cost to the contest as a whole. The changes you propose would kill Eurovision as a contest. Thankfully, EBU aren't stupid enough to implement these changes.