Contact us

DENMARK 2013 - Emmelie de Forest - Only Teardrops

How do you rate this entry?


  • Total voters
    434

cegs5

Well-known member
Joined
March 6, 2012
Posts
6,360
:lol: Funny how people try to destroy this enter... It's not in my personal top 10 and I hope Denmark doesn't win this year...but I think It's unfair to say that there's favouritism ...no way!
 

cassio

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2010
Posts
4,837
Location
Copenhagen, Denmark
I think DR has really over done itself this year.....useing firerain and gold confetti fits this song so well. Even though that is cost us a lot of mony (more than dkk 100.000) it is well spend ..... It looks amazing so thank you DR for once you are doing someting amazingly right for our mony (DR is a public service channel)
 

cassio

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2010
Posts
4,837
Location
Copenhagen, Denmark
A happy Jacob after the semifinal yesterday

2vufr7q.jpg
 

euronut

Banned
Joined
February 25, 2011
Posts
272
I think DR has really over done itself this year.....useing firerain and gold confetti fits this song so well. Even though that is cost us a lot of mony (more than dkk 100.000) it is well spend ..... It looks amazing so thank you DR for once you are doing someting amazingly right for our mony (DR is a public service channel)

Perhaps you should tell Cypriotgirl that this constitutes an advantage. She doesn't seem to be able to grasp that concept.

The fact that money can buy you an advantage doesn't sit well with me. It creates a divide between the rich countries and the poor countries. I really do feel that this level of "non-creative" staging should be banned.
 

cegs5

Well-known member
Joined
March 6, 2012
Posts
6,360
I think DR has really over done itself this year.....useing firerain and gold confetti fits this song so well. Even though that is cost us a lot of mony (more than dkk 100.000) it is well spend ..... It looks amazing so thank you DR for once you are doing someting amazingly right for our mony (DR is a public service channel)

Was it afford by tv broadcaster only? In Finland YLE has been more austere and Krista had to find her own ways to afford her promotion and her performance, just like Lordi did it in 2006 when YLE denied to pay for pyro and paraphernalia, so they had to collect the money from the fans and events.
 

cassio

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2010
Posts
4,837
Location
Copenhagen, Denmark
Was it afford by tv broadcaster only? In Finland YLE has been more austere and Krista had to find her own ways to afford her promotion and her performance, just like Lordi did it in 2006 when YLE denied to pay for pyro and paraphernalia, so they had to collect the money from the fans and events.

Eventhough emmelie is royal I believe that she cant afort to pay for the fireworks then there is only DR left

every artifect or gimick each contry use is paied buy them self
 

euronut

Banned
Joined
February 25, 2011
Posts
272
Eventhough emmelie is royal I believe that she cant afort to pay for the fireworks then there is only DR left

every artifect or gimick each contry use is paied buy them self

As long as you can afford it in the first place. What a fair platform :rolleyes:
 

Magizian

Well-known member
Joined
May 16, 2011
Posts
2,429
Location
Denmark
Perhaps you should tell Cypriotgirl that this constitutes an advantage. She doesn't seem to be able to grasp that concept.

The fact that money can buy you an advantage doesn't sit well with me. It creates a divide between the rich countries and the poor countries. I really do feel that this level of "non-creative" staging should be banned.

The big 5.... Talk about favouritism.

Aren't you from the UK?
 

No Name

Active member
Joined
October 1, 2009
Posts
3,818
The big 5.... Talk about favouritism.

You're so right.
Complaints about us being favored and buying ESC addressed by people from pre-qualified countries is double standards. If anyone bought ESC, it's them. But I guess euronut feels different about that.
 

A-lister

Veteran
Joined
December 28, 2009
Posts
32,825
I'm sorry neighbors, while I like your entry, It was never my #1... I mean it deserve to win more than many others, but I'd still rather see some other entries winning over this...

I do think it's a bit over-hyped, but I wouldn't be surprised if it wins. Well, I'm ok with it winning but yeah... not that blown away like many others seem to be.
 

Scooby

Well-known member
Joined
October 1, 2009
Posts
8,395
Location
Moon
She was great and everything was great. And i love it. But dont know why I cant see her winning in Saturday
 

Terence

Active member
Joined
January 30, 2012
Posts
4,182
Location
Malta
General comments from friends (casual viewers) on Facebook yesterday/today is that they liked Denmark most.
 

euronut

Banned
Joined
February 25, 2011
Posts
272
You're so right.
Complaints about us being favored and buying ESC addressed by people from PQ-countries is double standards. If anyone bought ESC, it's them. But I guess euronut feels different about that.

No, I completely disgaree with big 5 favouritism and have spoken many times on forums about that too. I believe we should all compete to win a place at Eurovision. I have always been against a Big 5 but it's hard to argue for a change when so many countries only vote for their neighbours. I would also like to see more scrutiny on the quality of local juries. You see, I am all about fairness. That is why I am so annoyed at the way this contest is being presented to buy votes.

I fully expected the Swedes to do good for the contest by introducing a fairer contest. It seems by choosing the running order they are doing the complete opposite.
 

Terence

Active member
Joined
January 30, 2012
Posts
4,182
Location
Malta
Totally agree with what the Australian commentator said on the UK coverage. It is not right that they presented the Danish entry almost as if it had already won. A glitter drops and waterfall pyro's are for a winning song. Really annoyed at that. It was like we were being told who to vote for.

Well anyone could have opted for glitter drops & waterfall... and it was similar to how it was performed in the Danish NF, so it's not as if it was staged to win (although a friend of mine did say that the use of such props is unfair - but if the option was available, why not use it?)
 

euronut

Banned
Joined
February 25, 2011
Posts
272
I felt like I was watching the performance of the winning song at the end of the grand final when I watched the Danish entry. And not because it was the best song, but because of the way it was presented. It was overkill. I don't blame Denmark, I blame those that allowed it.

It is dangerous to allow such vast differences in the way that some songs are presented. It gives unfair advantage and doesn't sit well with me when it's only there for those countries that can afford to pay for it. It should be all about the song and the artistic performance of that song.

I won't say any more as I am repeating myself and I don't wish to hijack the Danish thread. After all, it is a nice song. Albeit a little predictable.
 
Top Bottom