escYOUnited
Administrator
- Joined
- September 28, 2009
- Posts
- 1,355
and Cheeky Girls forSamanda or riot
"Big names" don't mean shit in ESC lol if said big name" is way past their expiration date: Bonnie Tyler and Engelbert did poorly, compare that to the current SUPERSTARS that are Dami Im and Sergey Lazarev. Jade and Blue did well, but they also had songs that sold themselves. Songs is what it boils down to for the UK. Talent isn't the problem, they fucking have it aplenty. Michael Rice has charisma and a great voice, SuRie likewise Their failure also revolve around the shitsongs that they assign to whichever unlucky soul wins that NF of theirs.
Just pump the production resources into the music, UK, and you'll be fine. No guarantee I will like your entrant, but at least you won't embarrass yourself.
well, just send one of the big names I've dropped and the UK will again be on the left side of the scoreboard, at least top ten.
But the big names you mentioned are successful and known worldwide already : why would they bother taking part? They'd gain nothing from the contest.
As Boris explained, picking a famous name doesn't mean the song would be good anyway. We've had examples of that in the past.
The song should be the main concern, for there is no shortage of talented singers in need of a platform to showcase themselves. I'd say let them have it.
UK is winning 2020. I feel it in my waters.
UK is winning 2020. I feel it in my waters.
Hahahahahahahahaha
"We are thrilled to have won the tender and be working with the BBC... It could be a new act, it could be an emerging act, it could be an act coming back. It's a complete blank canvas. The song will definitely have a BMG songwriter's involvement, it may well be a co-write. The most important thing is to come up with the best song. As we've seen, the average hit now has four to five writers on it."
"We will take this opportunity to really come through with the strongest entrant by taking input and feedback from a variety of places, starting with our great music publishing team here, which is a great place to build from. Whoever the artist is, the track will be on BMG and the song will have some BMG publishing within it."
Michael Rice having charisma is one of the biggest lies I've ever read on this forum xD
Music Week have an interview with Alistair Norbury, president, repertoire and marketing UK for BMG, the headline interestingly asks... "Should an established act be chosen as the UK's Eurovision entry?"
Here are some interesting excerpts from it...
I think this suggests the BBC have given BMG quite a lot of control in the selection and definitely bodes well for the UK next year.
Ultimately for me though success next year has to be placing somewhere on the left-hand side of the board, and a moderately successful hit in the local charts at least top 10 top 20.
To be honest, why is our only aim the left-hand side of the scoreboard? We should be in it to win it!
Further note, it doesn't matter whether it's an established artist or not, all that matters is the song quality, production and staging! I'm pretty sure BMG will be responsible for promotion, the music video, staging etc. I'm intrigued as to what we're going to send next year...all we can do is pray they've finally snapped!