This , except for the "Fuego level success" I think... yes with the performance this could be a hit in ESC... but the song is rather flat imo...
Also, ESC entries struggle to cross-over in general and also Eastern acts almost never cross-over to Western markets where the big cash is so I think she's satisfied with becoming more popular in Russia for now... after all Russia is VERY welcoming lately of Ukrainian acts that choose to make it big there, no surprise really since it's also used of course in the propaganda war against Ukraine and the west "hey look you can make it big here, forget about trying in the west... welcome to Russia your real home, you choose us over Ukraine and yadda yadda yadda"... so for sure her career will get a proper boost in Russia now, I hope it'll all be worth it in the end though... but hey ... it's all about the money really and if she, her label and her management think there won't be a big chance in the west anyways, then Russia is the best shot at some success...
GOOD. UABC or whatever their name is don't deserve to take part. I feel sorry on behalf of all Eurovision fans in Ukraine, but this is justice for Maruv.
Why did the entire top 3 refuse though? Because of the broadcaster's behaviour?
You might be right but then again, Fuego was not half as popular when it was released, it didn't even do anything in the odds until the rehearsals started. People kept on saying the song is flat and boring, nothing special etc. Yet streaming-wise it ended up becoming even bigger than the winning song.
And Maruv herself said she would have come top 5. If she believed her song would do so well, why would she still not accept the offer? Girl obviously just wanted to make a statement and shade the current political state. You can tell how uncomfortable she was when Jamala asks her the question. I'm not saying what she did was wrong but ... after being the public's winner and having a "top 5 song", why do you still say no? It's like she wanted to piss off the delegation.
Because of such a shit contract. They would have had to pay for everything themselves in Israel and could get a heavy fine if they talked to journalists without UABC's acceptance. They could also get fined if they improvised on stage, like doing a split. Lol. They can honestly go f*ck themselves, that's not what Eurovision is about. If an entertainer is in the zone and wants to do a split they should be able to.
Justice for Maruv? I can't at people still seeing her as innocent when it's clear she is part of this mess and used it for self-publicity... she and her team wanted to breach even EBU agreements, how does that make her a victim?
I am super proud of Ukrainian singers/artists for steping together and saying no to politics in art and ESC. Finally, a group of common people is sending a clear message to politics they had enough. Today I am very proud of Ukrainians.
[MENTION=4544]A-lister[/MENTION]
Please, don't mix vocal opposition to the Ukrainian politicisation of their entries like Jamala's 1944 by me as a sign that I am anti-Ukrainian. Let me clarify one thing for you. Ukrainians are Slavs like me, and for me, they are like distant cousins whom I love dearly and equally like Russians, Slovaks, Serbs, and any other Slavic nation. I know it is hard for you to wrap your head around this idea, but this is a fact. You know how I feel right now? I am sad that Ukraine won't take part in ESC this year, but at the same time very happy because common people/artist/singers said they are sick tired of stupid politicians. Ukraine, see you next year. Luv you, bros!
How is it Maruv's fault that UABC accepted her song in the selection when they knew it was connected to Warner Music Russia? They wanted the rights to be dropped, which isn't free and I doubt UABC would've paid for it. Don't know what EBU agreements Maruv breached, you tell me.
Eurovision shouldn't be an atmosphere where you, as an artist, can't speak to whoever you want or about whatever you want or where you have to be severely afraid of doing the wrong thing on stage
[MENTION=4544]A-lister[/MENTION] you're honestly the first swede I've ever met who doesn't have a problem with freedom of speech being suppressed
EBU has alot of rules about what can and cannot be done on stage, and yes if the act would do something against those rules, the broadcaster would have to pay the fine...
Maybe if they bring out a Nagarno-Karabach flag or something. I seriously doubt Måns Zelmerlöw would've been in trouble if he missed a camera and did a split on stage. Still waiting for how she breached EBU rules?
How can you defend a contract that is against freedom of speech, especially in a Eurovision context? I seriously doubt EBU makes them sign contracts they can't speak upon free will.