Musicosity
Active member
- Joined
- February 22, 2011
- Posts
- 3,109
Afaik there is no difference. According to the 2012 rulebook the second dress rehearsal is considered to be the event in which the juries will vote.
I think it was.So it was or was not the real jury voting when she cough?
So it was or was not the real jury voting when she cough?
So it was or was not the real jury voting when she cough?
I don't think it will. But the jury results will be interesting to read, especially when the rumours are true that some other artists gave an outstanding performance. What a music professional actually thinks about Euphoria in relation to the other entries I can't guess.I don't think it's gonna affect anything. Loreen is an amazing singer and the song is very good. One little cough isn't going to destroy her winning chances.
I don't get it -
Does that mean because Nordic countries are announcing their votes after #26 that Sweden will most likely have scored the highest with the juries (due to the dynamic voting)?
I dare say that Sweden won the jury vote. All nordic and baltic countries do not announce their votes before #26 in the runnig order, whereas the Balkan and CEE countries are early.
Before anyone criticizes her for doing this: To mention it as a representative of Eurovision would be grounds for disqualification from the contest.xgood She did this on her own as a private person and have not even mentioned it as a representative for the Swedish ESC team.
Exactly what I've been saying. People who have no idea what the juries have been instructed to base their points on should stop crying "She made a mistake! She'll be penalized!".Calm down, people. This is not like a sports jury, where they deduct points for each mistake, as in gymnastics or figure skating. The jury evaluates the performance as a whole, and if that incident didn't have an impact on the overall performance, it shouldn't make a difference.
If we're gonna compare their entries this year, it's pretty obvious that it's Sweden. Norway is just... bad, Denmark is so-so and Iceland has a pretty "meh" live performance. None of them are bad (except Norway), but Sweden just blows the other Nordic countries away this year.What than means if that's computer who know the televoting result from the semis and the juries votes for the final decided (knowing the previous years voting paterns) in order not to make the winner too obvious too early to have no scandinavian annoucing their votes before half of the voting.
So what we can deduce if that probably either Denmark, Iceland, Norway, Sweden & maybe Estonia (or maybe two countries it can be a Nordic fight) did really well with televoting in it's semi and well enough with juries for the computer to think it might be a very logical winner.
To say that it's Sweden is just pure speculation, but that seems like the most logical choice.
If you have some information about the jury instructions please feel free to share it with us. And please don't forget to name your sources.Exactly what I've been saying. People who have no idea what the juries have been instructed to base their points on should stop crying "She made a mistake! She'll be penalized!".
I still don't want to see Sweden winning but there is no one who can bring the contest to his/her country. :/ Loreen can do that.