ESC United Mod Team
Super Moderator
- Joined
- February 10, 2021
- Posts
- 214
Last edited by a moderator:
Unfortunately, it's stupid that they have abolished the jury in the semi-finals. I understand the reason, but isn't the televoting also completely 'biased' in some countries?
Unfortunately, this factor means that some songs might have difficulties in qualifying (so, looking at Portugal, we have a serious problem).
It's a terrible draw; we have 1/4 of our most potential voters (I wouldn't include Italy in this list at all). Now, Switzerland, France, and Luxembourg have an interested diaspora that votes for Portugal regardless of the music (some pathoitarianism here). Spain is more uncertain lately, I think due to the proximity, for a person from the border, it's easy to vote, we have some diaspora and neighbor voting, after all, it's a safe voter, but less clear.
And then it seems to me that we are in the stronger semi-final, but it's a bit unfair because we still haven't met half of the songs and there are countries that might send literally any type/genre of music.
With this, Iolanda still seems to me a possible qualifier, but just borderline and she would need to have a good staging and a good allocation position.
Overall, it seems that we have an entry with some potential but that can also be a complete disaster. João, if he does something 'out of the box', something surprising, he might catch a percentage of the most "alternative Eurovision" vote. After all, rock has achieved several very positive results in the televote, could Portuguese progressive rock, with good staging, be well received? Without seeing the performances, it's not possible to say much for now.
We have to have a very efficient presentation in May, with that, everything will be possible, despite an unfavorable draw (this is undeniable)
Something that people seem unware is that Portugal has no time to revamp the staging, I think this year we will have 1 week day after the final to submit all the info on how the the song will be staged to the EBU.The RTP team needs to take some money for the staging and preparation for the big event.
Stop that elitist attitude about stagings and props. Portugal is just about to change government and RTP will be affected for sure. This might be their last approach.
Yes, exactly! I asked myself that question for the past two years. Having the studio during the pandemic made sense, but after what RTP was trying to do with FdC until 2020, I don't understand why they gave up presenting the national final in other cities. At the same time, they are participating in JESC, even though it's something that Portuguese people don't care that much.Something that people seem unware is that Portugal has no time to revamp the staging, I think this year we will have 1 week day after the final to submit all the info on how the the song will be staged to the EBU.
The artists competing on Festival da Canção should be thinking already how they will stage it on Eurovision and RTP should move the nf into an auditorium to try the first draft in an actually stage with live audience, the stage in the studio has become better in the last years, but still is small and even if it more expensive to rent an auditorium for a month, selling tickes and maybe even getting a couple of sponsors could make it cost the same.
Also one thing I don't understand is why RTP cares so much about JESC, they can't monetise the contest through the phone calls and it isn't a viable way to promote the portuguese music industry/culture like you can in ESC, why not just withdraw from JESC and use that budget to improve the nf and make the portuguese representative shine brighter on Eurovision? I honestly don't understand.
I agree I hate how people pretend that the televote isn't biased when it's way more biased than the jury.
For example, Albania this year will almost definitely qualify since they have Greece, the rest of the world (Kosovo), Austria, Italy and Switzerland voting in the semi - this is around 50 points on lock! Now how many points would Portugal get if they sent the same song? Probably around 15, probably not even that. When it comes to jury, they're only biased when it comes to countries like Cyprus/Greece (and even that wasn't the case last year) or Moldova/Romania.
idk, how people don't find this problematic but find the juries problematic when they're clearly way less biased.
Good point. When ESC fans adore the televote, it may be because they themselves have a "cosmopolitan" approach - they forget that many viewers don't have that.
In some countries Eurovision had its low point when the results were 100% televote during the mid 00's. Many had the feeling that the increasing number of Eastern European countries handed points to each other and thus stole the show. I think the criticism was more or less justified. Personally, I want to keep the jury, possibly at a 33% influence rate.
Having said that, you could argue that the televote bias is a bit easier to live with, simply because it's "what people think", while a jury bias is more suspicious and could be manipulated.
I could go on and on.
NOBLE - Memory (5/10) @Looren's incoming favourite
Iolanda performing "Cura" on tv a couple of days ago:
The stage of Festival da Canção 2024: