ESC United Mod Team
Super Moderator
- Joined
- February 10, 2021
- Posts
- 214
I fundamentally disagree; I don’t want to see more anti LGBT countries enter the contest - besides a lot of the countries you’ve listed are taking progressive steps - Ukraine hosted its first pride last year. I’m not in favour of kicking out those countries because it’s more hassle than it’s worth; however it’s easier to decline admission to new countries to the contest on those grounds.It's big within the community sure and meant alot to it and vice versa, but it's still not an "LGB+T Festival" and even as a gay person myself I am not jumping onboard on that.
Anyways, strictly in terms of legislation (at least what I could find out on a quick research), Kazakhstan is actually less restrictive when it comes to gay rights than Armenia and Azerbaijan, and quite en par with Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine, Poland and Italy (to name a few, where the latter two basically have some cosmetical laws only due to EU membership), so if that's your criteria, I guess we should start to kick out countries then? But then again it is NOT an "LGB+T Festival" and whether one likes it or not, gay rights in countries have not been a criteria for entering Eurovision hence why ruZZia and belaruZ took part until recently and EBU still being keen on Turkey coming back (all three being more legislative restrictive than Kazakhstan) (plus the countries I already mentioned).
I mean I agree with you but the reality is we have many countries that are homophobic. Almost every country in the east tbh. I agree with you though. It's problematic. I still remember when Russia hosted Eurovision. That was a mess. I don't want Eurovision to turn into something like Fifa where they talk about human rights all the time but then host the thing in Quatar and defend the decision with the most stupid arguments. And that was terrible for gay rights. On Social Media there were many homophobic comments and some went mega viral. It would obviously change the contest when we start bringing homophobic countries in. That being said from what I've heard Kazakhstan is not that bad and even a bit progressive (or more progressive than the other countries in that region). I think they would be fine. Not any different from having for example Poland or North Macedonia in the contest.No thank you.
Equality for same sex couples or stay well away from an LGBT inclusive festival of love and light
I fundamentally disagree; I don’t want to see more anti LGBT countries enter the contest - besides a lot of the countries you’ve listed are taking progressive steps - Ukraine hosted its first pride last year. I’m not in favour of kicking out those countries because it’s more hassle than it’s worth; however it’s easier to decline admission to new countries to the contest on those grounds.
Girl you have a serbian flag on your profileNo thank you.
Equality for same sex couples or stay well away from an LGBT inclusive festival of love and light
Girl I love SanjaGirl you have a serbian flag on your profile
Or maybe they're saving funds for ESC 2024...
Is Eurovision celebration of music and diversity or democracy? Why EBU should reject authoritarian state, while they don't intervene when one broadcaster rig their own NF?I wont be shedding a tear, anyone that claims to be progressive shouldnt want Kazakhstan anywhere near the contest. We need less authoritarian backwards states in Eurovision not more
Is Eurovision celebration of music and diversity or democracy? Why EBU should reject authoritarian state, while they don't intervene when one broadcaster rig their own NF?
Yes, so why would EBU want to influence state's regime, when they don't really control entries in their own competition?There are no requirements to even have a NF, countries can decide what song to send in what ever fashion they want really. The EBU doesn't have rules and regulations to govern that.
Yes, so why would EBU want to influence state's regime, when they don't really control entries in their own competition?
Kinda ironic but just about 20 years ago, in 2003, Russia wanted a lesbian kiss in the end of the performance, but EBU warned Russia that they would not accept t.A.T.u. kissing on the cameras because it is against the values of a family show. You may use and interpret that information in any way you would like.Darling if it wasn’t for the LGBT community, Eurovision would cease to exist in today’s ever changing world of TV entertainment. It’s a big gay festival after all, you only have to take a look at the Eurovision Village to recognise that. Naturally though, it can be enjoyed by those from all walks of life… but not those who seek to persecute a minority group simply for wanting to live their true lives.
EBU has changed with the times. Kazakhstan has not.Kinda ironic but just about 20 years ago, in 2003, Russia wanted a lesbian kiss in the end of the performance, but EBU warned Russia that they would not accept t.A.T.u. kissing on the cameras because it is against the values of a family show. You may use and interpret that information in any way you would like.
Why not let them break the taboos of public with such events if this means the first step for them, instead of excluding them altogether?EBU has changed with the times. Kazakhstan has not.
Breaking taboos would start legislatively. Then we can talk Eurovision.Why not let them break the taboos of public with such events if this means the first step for them, instead of excluding them altogether?