ESC United Mod Team
Super Moderator
- Joined
- February 10, 2021
- Posts
- 214
Last edited by a moderator:
I was waiting for you! I wrote this message just for youThis is all for you to try Anyway, I'll add a thought to my previous thought. So far only "Ulveham" "Zorra" can compete with "Tuta Gold" (and Irama, Angelina and Annalisa). In fact, I wouldn't even be so sure of Angelina and Annalisa's supremacy over Norwegian and Spanish songs. Technically the songs by Annalisa and Angelina are not bad but they lack that epic effect that distinguishes them from the crowd (perhaps Angelina does better than Annalisa).
Italy with "Tuta Gold" will win in Malmö without anyone being able to hinder them. Everyone in the world is crazy about it. It has the same power as Käärijää but a finer and vocally non-dispersive construction.
Keep an eye on Irama btw: Tuesday he was 9th in the odds now it's fourth and approaching Annalisa on third. I can see his song in the superfinal, tbh...
How is that possible? The song is pretty bad, the singer has no charisma... I can not get it.Italy give me Mahmood, Irama, Annalisa, Angelina idc. BUT PLEASE don't pick Geolier.
You didn't catch my words I'm not talking about quality but about "impacting force". Technically Annalisa and Angelina may be superior but will they know how not to get lost in the mass of divas in sparkling costumes? Either you have a song with a crazy or epic show attached (Netta and Loren) or you don't go beyond Nina Zilli's position (the maximum position that Angelina could reach). Nebulossa can fail miserably, settle in mid-table or surprise but you can't say she has no identitySorry I was missing the party traveling around Malaysia.
I've noticed that @Paco Roca could be under some sort of hallucinations otherwise it's not possible he could compare Nebulosa to Annalisa or Angelina. Two different leagues. Not only Nebulosa but the whole concept of BenidormFest isn't comparable even with Sanremo Giovani. Could you dare to compare the amateurish Spanish proposals to what came out from Sanremo Giovani, I mean Clara Santi Francesi and Co.
Love you Paco
Darling we also know how it finished with the transalpine and transpirenees divas last year. Oh they were trying so hard in the top of huge pedestal or singing so loudly to make people change the channel. They got nothing.You didn't catch my words I'm not talking about quality but about "impacting force". Technically Annalisa and Angelina may be superior but will they know how not to get lost in the mass of divas in sparkling costumes? Either you have a song with a crazy or epic show attached (Netta and Loren) or you don't go beyond Nina Zilli's position (the maximum position that Angelina could reach). Nebulossa can fail miserably, settle in mid-table or surprise but you can't say she has no identity
Only listened to the Top12 in the Odds, cause the Rest is probably irrelevant.
The Kolors - Un Ragazzo una Ragazza 8.6/10
Mahmood - Tuta Gold 7.7/10
Irama - Tu no - 7.3/10
Angelina Mango - La Noia 7.0/10
Il Volo - Capolavoro 6.7/10
Annalisa - Sinceramente 5.0/10
Alessandra Amoroso - Fino a qui 4.8/10
Diodato - Ti muovi 4.7/10
Geolier - I P'me, tu p'te 4.1/10
Negramaro - Ricominciamo tutto 3.6/10
Emma - Apnea 3.3/10
Loredana Berte - Pazza 2.2/10
Rumors say Geolier got over 50% percent at the televoting on Wednesday evening. Against strong contestants such as Irama and Annalisa. No one in Sanremo history has ever got so much voting. Juries will not tank him enough to let him lose
From my limited understanding, yes it does appear to be proportional.Even if the juries put him last in the top 5? That can lowkey happen if idk Loredana, Angelina, Mahmood and Annalisa are with him. So even if he gets 1st tele, let's say 4th radio jury and 5th jury he wins? I don't get the system, can someone explain it to me? Is it proportional?