I hear you, just to clarify what I mean a bit (which I also stated on the forum before):
When I look at Sanremo, it's more how it seems to be (at least to an outsider) an active force in Italian music and a representation of that market and for that market first and foremost. It doesn't try to be something else (a tool for Eurovision or a musical bubble unrelated to the current music scene of the country which Melodifestivalen currently is) and also manages to attract big and popular local names (which MF is unable to do with its current approach).
What I don't like with Sanremo, and here I agree with you that Melodifestivalen is better, is the odd and lengthy structure and format, the questionable juries and voting system (which still to a larger extent seems to favor male and/-or conservative entries, even if it has become better lately), the random cover evening thrown into the mix etc.
I mean there are pros and cons with both, but if we look at what actually matters in the end and that is the music it produces, then yes I think Sanremo is these days a far stronger and more relevant selection than Melodifestivalen (see more previous points).
I agree with what you say.
As an Italian (and I believe many others like me too), I am proud that Sanremo is not "a tool for the ESC". This guarantees higher quality.
The juries and the votes, I admit, are a little crazy. However, I do not fully agree when you say that the Italian system is "patriarchal". We go to see the songs that have brought the female singers and we see that compared to the male singers, they are not sinful of talent but of strong songs. I go to mind, I hope not to forget something, maybe only Elodie with "Andromeda" had a strong enough song.
Arisa, for example, is able to do and has shown it also energetic songs and instead in Sanremo she always brings ballads full of love or sad ... Baby K has never expressed the will to participate in Sanremo and ... Elettra Lamborghini and Myss Keta are unable to compete with the many queens of the ESC. Probably, this year Elisa could be a candidate for victory and, compared to the majority of Italian artists, she is used to singing in English too (will Italy for the first time choose not to sing in Italian?).
On the "conservative" songs, it is true that Sanremo have a predilection for ballads and melody but in reality at the ESC, from 2011 to today, we have always brought new genres. We have gradually left our "old dress". Sanremo has been giving more and more space to artists for years, I will give you some examples, such as Irama ("La genesi del tuo colore", first of all), Willie Peyote (with his opposing rap), Achille Lauro (with his style irreverent), The Maneskin (with their Rock) and also the Boomdabash (with Cuban / Caribbean sounds).
Probably, the problem of the Melodifestivalen but above all of the whole ESC panorama is that the other delegations struggle to bring their best singers to the ESC stage. There is still a strong stereotype about the European festival and the best singers are afraid to participate. From now on, however, with the ever-increasing success of the ESC and the global love achieved by the Maneskin, something will change.
You will not believe it but in Italy another revolution has taken place thanks to the Maneskin. Many famous singers in Italy hit the Maneskin hard because they were envious of their great success around the world. Surely it was also this that pushed Elisa to participate (her last participation was in 2001!). And it is also for this reason that an artist like Ana Mena has chosen to participate, not through the Spanish ESC selection, but through the tough race in Sanremo.
I remain of the opinion that Sweden will be able to bring strong singers in the coming years, will not be afraid to sing in Swedish and will be able to experience the Melodifestivalen as an important festival and not as a satellite for the ESC. Who knows, it was we Italians who gave you this stimulus? Our passion is contagious and there is no mask that can protect you
I am a poet!
Give me a violin!