ESC United Mod Team
Super Moderator
- Joined
- February 10, 2021
- Posts
- 214
Aside from that: what did she mean by „representing an underrepresented group“? what group should that be?
People need to stop being harsh on vocals here. They had to perform in a 60 year old talk show studio with terrible acoustics and mic technology that wouldn't be used by any other broadcaster in Western eurooe. RTE cheaped out again as they are financial a mess (its a big scandal in ireland), but Bambie could do very, very well on a large stage with professional mixed backing vocals, good acoustics, a modern sound system and lots of mood setting visuals.
I REALLY need a proper update on non-binary. Everytime I think I understood it there‘s a new one identifying as such and I‘m again totally confused because it‘s again something completely different.She's non-binary.
I also believe she referred to the way she dresses as well.
This is exactly my concerns. I'm in no way comparing the two here, as they're very different clearly, but Cha Cha Cha last year combined some darkness and alternative elements with a more commercial song structure and more recognisable hook. That's what helped it to cut through with everyone.I understand the agenda but I’m just extremely unconvinced that this was the best choice. There needs to be more of a balance between the unconventional and the accessible to be competitive and I just think some people are too eager to embrace the former for the sake of diversity. Even in a televote-only semi, I don’t think being polarising is necessarily a plus for Ireland this year when you consider we already have a more palatable and coherent song in Veronika in a small selection of songs, and with the ongoing trend indicating more entries deviating from the Eurovision norm.
That shit always makes me giggle.She's non-binary.
I must say I've followed the ones from previous years and the stage was also crap. But this year, someone said the stage would be in a different set, so I had (slightly) better expectationsLadies and gentleman, we have a Eurosong virgin!
so you‘re giving a (according to you) bad song, that is (according to you) not even original points because it‘s different (which basically means original)?!? what now?It's an absolutely dreadful musical composition I will not play or listen to ever again (gave me a migraine early Saturday ), and it's not even original for us who have wider historical knowledge of music (M. Manson met Billie Eilish, we've heard this when she was a baby).
However, as it is very conceptual, artistic and different, and it also brings new styles to Eurovision, it is absolutely what Eurovision needs a year after the juries had hacked the competition from the people to present the win to the most predictable, uninspiring and boring entry that Tattoo was.
Therefore, for the variety it gives to the competition, I gave this a 12 in the poll and I'll vote for this at least once.
Ireland, you have finally shown some true colors. This will be first time in years that we we won't press skip when we see Ireland 2024 coming in the medley. Good luck
so you‘re giving a (according to you) bad song, that is (according to you) not even original points because it‘s different (which basically means original)?!? what now?
understood.In Eurovision different doesn't mean original. It means it's just different from 23 other Swedish pop entries in the Grand Final. That's how low the standard of variety at Eurovision is
I recommend widening music habits to different genres. Even watching MTV 90's channel might help the beginners.
understood.
personally I don‘t give the highest score possible to songs I dont find good. Different for me is not a criteria for quality. As for your recommendation - totally agree with you. As long as it doesn‘t result in torture of course.