Finland FINLAND 2014 - Softengine - Something Better
- Thread starter escYOUnited
- Start date
- Watchers 27
Knubelznarm
Active member
- Joined
- February 5, 2012
- Posts
- 1,257
Re: FINLAND 2014
Excuse my tone, I just think it's unfair when people pick on small vocal mishaps which was all I heard in that performance. I don't think we could have asked for more from her.
Softengine is alright, but a little bit unoriginal imo. I expected them to do well though.
Excuse my tone, I just think it's unfair when people pick on small vocal mishaps which was all I heard in that performance. I don't think we could have asked for more from her.
Softengine is alright, but a little bit unoriginal imo. I expected them to do well though.
QwaarJet
ESC Moderator
Re: FINLAND 2014
That's going to be a packed semi-final.
That's going to be a packed semi-final.
Re: FINLAND 2014
These were the juries' points 1-10 (they are not allowed to give the same points to 2 artists)
1. Softengine 8+10+9+9 = 36 (22,5 %)
2. Hukka ja Mama 10+9+8+8 = 35 (21,9 %)
3. Jasmin Michaela 7+8+7+7 = 29 (18,1 %)
4. MIAU 6+7+6+4 = 23 (14,4 %)
5. Dennis Fagerström 4+5+5+5 = 19 (11,9 %)
6. Lili Lambert 3+6+3+6 = 18 (11,3 %)
These were the juries' points 1-10 (they are not allowed to give the same points to 2 artists)
1. Softengine 8+10+9+9 = 36 (22,5 %)
2. Hukka ja Mama 10+9+8+8 = 35 (21,9 %)
3. Jasmin Michaela 7+8+7+7 = 29 (18,1 %)
4. MIAU 6+7+6+4 = 23 (14,4 %)
5. Dennis Fagerström 4+5+5+5 = 19 (11,9 %)
6. Lili Lambert 3+6+3+6 = 18 (11,3 %)
Re: FINLAND 2014
Random order, no televoting results revealed. 50% of the points were from the juries, 50% televotes.
Random order, no televoting results revealed. 50% of the points were from the juries, 50% televotes.
Re: FINLAND 2014
Well, Softengine was 1st or 2nd (Audience loved Jasmin's performance) , so Hukka ja Mama could be just 3rd so no chance in Final I guess...
If Jasmin focus more on singing instead of dancing (some eye contact with cameras + her smile would be good) , stress out a bit , she can do it!
Well, Softengine was 1st or 2nd (Audience loved Jasmin's performance) , so Hukka ja Mama could be just 3rd so no chance in Final I guess...
If Jasmin focus more on singing instead of dancing (some eye contact with cameras + her smile would be good) , stress out a bit , she can do it!
RainyWoods
Croak-kay
Re: FINLAND 2014
Even though her song is wrecked, i'm still totally besotted with Jasmin for some reason. I agree with Yoozek. She can win this with a stronger vocal. She was beyond perfect before when she was just standing still. It's only natural that moving the buttocks creates tremors of the vocal. The vocal wasn't horrendous however. Just shaky in parts. Nowhere near as bad as some performances with movement.
Even though her song is wrecked, i'm still totally besotted with Jasmin for some reason. I agree with Yoozek. She can win this with a stronger vocal. She was beyond perfect before when she was just standing still. It's only natural that moving the buttocks creates tremors of the vocal. The vocal wasn't horrendous however. Just shaky in parts. Nowhere near as bad as some performances with movement.
Re: FINLAND 2014
Must say that I was positively surprised when Dennis was not the one who was chosen straight to the final. Of course the juries helped here a lot with their low points - that might mean that they don't want to let him win in the final either (if he gets there).
Must say that I was positively surprised when Dennis was not the one who was chosen straight to the final. Of course the juries helped here a lot with their low points - that might mean that they don't want to let him win in the final either (if he gets there).
dezbee2008
Well-known member
Re: FINLAND 2014
I'm happy with Jasmin's performance, however, she should focus more on singing, but I got no complaints, other than Hukku ja Mama and Softengine scoring higher than her. But it is what it is
I'm happy with Jasmin's performance, however, she should focus more on singing, but I got no complaints, other than Hukku ja Mama and Softengine scoring higher than her. But it is what it is