A-lister
Veteran
- Joined
- December 28, 2009
- Posts
- 32,825
Re: ESTONIA 2012
I think the jury points speaks for themselves.
Care to explain?
I think the jury points speaks for themselves.
Care to explain?
I always say that the difference between an artist and "just a singer" is the creative aspect. Artistry means to create something. Quite often the best artists doesn't necessarily have the technical best singing voices, but they have a creative mind so they usually write/compose themselves or with others.
"just singers" well they may be technical good singers, but they often lack any creativity and imo quite boring and not very entertaining. But that's just my personal opinion.
I'm not against launching yourself through the internet, but I would still prefer people who are more than just wailing voices and actually have something else in the bag.
What I'm fearing though is ESC desperately trying to copy the Idol concept (with the juries onboard) and here we are with all these "voices", while the songs aren't very interesting or anything anymore and the shows lacks people with star-quality and charisma.
mmm, Uku Suviste.... Narmish, have you seen him on the recent New Wave opening? He has such a hot temperament
That's perfectly comprehensible, however I'm stating that "just a singer" could have potential once all of the details such as creating/finding the right song have been settled. I don't know the talents of this girl, but she may very well write her own songs in addition to singing covers of more well-known ones. But a minor detail such as uploading videos of yourself singing covers of popular music shouldn't be a disqualifying factor because, like I said, everyone starts from somewhere.
In my opinion, well known and popular singers aren't a necessary requirement and newcomers and amateurs can do just as well, if not better. At the end of the day its up to the voting public in Estonia and the jury panel to decide whether she, or anyone else for that matter, have what it takes to represent them at ESC.
Wait, what? Just because they did not vote like you would have liked it does not mean they are biased against Ithaka Maria. Different taste, different preferences.I think the jury points speaks for themselves.
Wait, what? Just because they did not vote like you would have liked it does not mean they are biased against Ithaka Maria. Different taste, different preferences.
We all know that for A-Lister the one and onliest winner is Ithaka
Because Estonians enjoyed the song.You must have misunderstood me. You said Ithaka Maria was kicked out because ERR was biased against her. But then how did she pass through Eesti Laul pre-selection and made it to Eesti Laul final?
You must have misunderstood me. You said Ithaka Maria was kicked out because ERR was biased against her. But then how did she pass through Eesti Laul pre-selection and made it to Eesti Laul final?
I doubt any song would have been a bigger fail than Rockefeller street. But people decided against I want to meet Bob Dylan so it's elimination was fine.Sorry, but biased choice would have only been Outdamnz, imo. I couldn't understand, even my dear Iiris Vesik as a jury member gave highest point to "I wanna meet Bob Dylan". This would've been total fail. Now, at least i know that Estonian public will select the best one.
I doubt any song would have been a bigger fail than Rockefeller street. But people decided against I want to meet Bob Dylan so it's elimination was fine.
Hindsight is pointless. We will never know what would/could/should have been.