ESC United Mod Team
Super Moderator
- Joined
- February 10, 2021
- Posts
- 214
Last edited by a moderator:
The reason Lasagna isn't getting 150 jury points is exactly because Kaarija got 150 jury points. It's a clear ripoff.
With all due respect, if we're discussing facts, please ensure you have the full story straight before making such claims again. The only reason Baby Lasagna and Kaarija are mentioned together is because their melodies bear a slight resemblance. However, beyond that similarity, everything else is distinctly different. So, it wouldn't be fair to label it as a ripoff, would it?The reason Lasagna isn't getting 150 jury points is exactly because Kaarija got 150 jury points. It's a clear ripoff.
Likely tele winner, yes, but it can't win the actual contest unless they improve from Dora by unprecedented numbers.
I like him and wish him the best, but these are the facts.
If you're on about facts, your claim in bold is not true. People, including myself, have stated other reasons for the 'rip-off' or familiar feeling of Baby Lasagne's entry.With all due respect, if we're discussing facts, please ensure you have the full story straight before making such claims again. The only reason Baby Lasagna and Kaarija are mentioned together is because their melodies bear a slight resemblance. However, beyond that similarity, everything else is distinctly different. So, it wouldn't be fair to label it as a ripoff, would it?
When considering Baby Lasagna's performances in the NF semi-finals and finals, it's important to note that what Baby Lasagna wears is part of a national wardrobe, unlike Kaarija's attire. Kaarija wore a bolero, whereas Baby Lasagna's outfit included sleeves, highlighting the clear distinction between the two.
Furthermore, the lyrical content of both songs is vastly different. While Kaarija's song revolves around carefree drinking, Baby Lasagna's focuses on the struggle of growing up and leaving home, depicting themes of homesickness and familial bonds. As someone who left home at 19, this resonates deeply with me.
Let's be clear—I admire Kaarija and his song, which even made it into my top 5 last year. However, I'm tired of the baseless accusations labeling Baby Lasagna as a ripoff of Kaarija. If anything, the real repetition lies with Finland this year, attempting a similar approach twice in a row, albeit with an inferior song.
Inspiration does not mean ripp-off but okay. I agree Kaarija clearly inspired a few artists. But I don't see that as an issue. The song still has it's own authenticity.If you're on about facts, your claim in bold is not true. People, including myself, have stated other reasons for the 'rip-off' or familiar feeling of Baby Lasagne's entry.
The way the song is presented, the vibe is gives off is all (to me) clearly inspired by Kaarija and how its trying to ride on the success of Cha Cha Cha - an accusation I've also levelled at Finland this year, Estonia and the Netherlands. WIthout that, I don't think those songs would be here this year. The influence is clear to see. It's more than just a similar melody.
At no point have I said it’s a rip off - that’s why I put it in quote marks. I’ve always said copycat for what it’s worth. I just find it extremely similar in the way it’s sang and the general vibe. Of course they’re different songs, but from the same wheelhouse if you know what I mean.The melody is not very similar at all. Inspiration does not mean rip-off. Similar energy, different song. Basta!
Of course artists can be inspired by others - that’s what music is all about. I just don’t find this genuine at all. It comes across as a cynical attempt at aping Kaarija and his success.Inspiration does not mean ripp-off but okay. I agree Kaarija clearly inspired a few artists. But I don't see that as an issue. The song still has its own authenticity.
I still think Lasagna will get 150+ jury points. Bookmark this comment and feel free to laugh at me in May, if it turns out that I was wrong.You guys misinterpreted my message, which I don't blame you for. What I tried to say is that I don't think this has a shot in hell at 150 jury points is because Käärijä was unique - nothing like that had penetrated the ESC mainstream. He got FOURTH in jury voting despite amateurish perfo and not being able to sing at all. But now, we have multiple acts that are "following in Käärijä's footsteps" and that's undeniable when it comes to Croatia as well. One of the key metrics the juries grade songs on is authenticity and uniqueness. Käärijä had all that, but this one doesn't. It doesn't mean that it's the performers fault, those are big boots to fill. And this isn't even mentioning how much behind he is in charisma and the quality of the show.
The Dora performance would get maybe 20 jury points. A vastly improved version could get 100 but that's very generous and optimistic. There's no realistic path for this to actually win Eurovision, just like there isn't for Joost, either.
For what it's worth, I believe Croatia will easily win televoting and be the people's song of the year. But the final position in ESC will be closer to the guy in my avatar than victory.
I think Lithuania, Finland and The Netherlands are gonna be main reasons for this not to win. Too many countries are going Kaarja style bop this year.
No way NL wins the televote.You meant Estonia probably not Lithuania?
Otherwise agree. He's going to be max 6th with the juries and he'd need a landslide in televote for this to win (Käärijä style) and he won't succeed in that because Netherlands will probably win it.
No way NL wins the televote.