seb89
Active member
Macedonia has given plenty of points to Greece, they never give to us . . . this year we gave them 3.
Sorry, I need to write Greece-Macedonia. But I'm right though!
Macedonia has given plenty of points to Greece, they never give to us . . . this year we gave them 3.
That's just because I'm too lazy to check the dictionary to see if the translation is 100% accurate when it comes to grammar. But the verb stems are accurate.You like to emphasize thing, you shouldn't forget this one .
Sorry, I need to write Greece-Macedonia. But I'm right though!
That's just because I'm too lazy to check the dictionary to see if the translation is 100% accurate when it comes to grammar. But the verb stems are accurate.
Whatever it is, it's nothing like whatever you'd translate it into Spanish since it appears Portuguese actually has locative, which Spanish lacks (Spanish utilizes prepositions). So unless a Spaniard had studied some Portuguese grammar, they'd have no clue what the heck was being said since the lyrics would translate to (if one were to decipher it with one's knowledge of Spanish) "Sometimes (something) (not sure, but it probably means) you give with you [whatever]". Which makes zero sense. Because the orignal Portuguese lacks an actual subject (the person giving out [whatever]). And you'd never saidd "Sometimes [subject] gives with you [object]".I don't know Portuguese, so I dont know much, but I guess "dás" is second person singular (confirmed by verbix.com)? Why are you changing that in Spanish into 3rd person plural in Spanish in the first sentence?
I speak Spanish (semi-fluently). I didn't understand a word they sang because:
* Portuguese and Spanish aren't that similar in many respects. They share a common origin but Spanish people and Portuguese people can't share in meaningful conversations with each other unless they're both speakinng the same language.
* The artists couldn't sing well and mostly just yelled at the top of their lungs, so even if I spoke the languge, it would've been hard for me to understand what they were singing about because I couldn't actually tell what the flying fig they were "singing").
* It's a (probable) joke entry about the Carnation Revolution (or whatever it was called) that occurred in Portuggal a good 50 or so years ago. By the flying fig would the Spanish like it enough to give it 8 points?! Also, 8 points implies it got either the people's 12 (probable) or at least some jury points to help it along.
Yes... yes it is.
Here's an excerpt of the lyrics in Portuguese:
"Por vezes dás contigo desanimado
Por vezes dás contigo a desconfiar
Por vezes dás contigo sobressaltado
Por vezes dás contigo a desesperar"
Spanish translation (not 100% guaranteeed to be accurate):
"A veces le dan desalentados
A veces se te dé la desconfianza
A veces darle un nuevo comienzo
A veces te dé a la desesperación"
That's a whole lot of difference besides a few common-ish word-stems. And the grammar is quite different.
Except that system would introduce more problems than it would solve.If they (ESC) wanted to deal with block voting phenomenon, they could. A simple way would be to have the votes from every country multiplied by some factor (normalized), depending on geographical distance from the country voting. There could be geographical zones around each country, the nearest one getting no bonus, and scaling to the furthest one who would get a more significant bonus. More distant countries have supposedly more distant "cultural sound". If you think that this wouldn't be fair, just consider that the points as they are given today, are not proportional to votes. The -12 points may come from 200,000 votes while the -10 points may come from 40,000 votes and -6 points may come from only 5,000 votes.
I could go on and give more details on a possible algorithm, but I am sure no one would bother, nor is it my job - surely the ESC people could work something out. Of course, you may say, that it could get more complicated to understand voting and the competition might lose some fun. Well, it all depends on how well they would implement a more fair point-system - on the other hand, block-voting isn't that much fun as it is today, is it?
I didn't say it didn't make any sense.I would like to add my point of view as a Spanish native about the Portuguese song.
First of all, yep, average Spaniards could not get the whole meaning of the song (mainly for the phonetics of Portuguese from Portugal, that are quite different from Spain's Castillian), but it's not true that the Portuguese song had zero sense for us. Not at all!! I'm sure Spaniards understood this song, at least the protest message.
Allow me to look further than just the 12 pointers.By the way! You made me laugh with your "Iberian vote" point Look at the Spanish 12points votes last 10 years:
Ehem... Do you see block voting? Or Romanian diaspora voting? Thanks God (or whatever) the jury was introduced, or we would still giving our 12p to Romania!
I guess the Turkish diaspora forgot to vote Tuesday night.
So you're saying only those countries have high concentrations of Turkish diaspora votes? Are you then also saying that any points Turkey gains from any country other than those 4 should be counted as "legitimate" votes free from diaspora votes?I didn't know that about Portuguese, but I study Spanish, so I was wondering. Thanks for the explanation!
Like Turkish members said BEFORE the show: we have NOT the diaspora votes, because BELGIUM, THE NETHERLANDS, GERMANY & FRANCE didn't vote in that semi.
I didn't say it didn't make any sense.
Allow me to look further than just the 12 pointers.
...
So you're saying only those countries have high concentrations of Turkish diaspora votes? Are you then also saying that any points Turkey gains from any country other than those 4 should be counted as "legitimate" votes free from diaspora votes?
But now will give us your 12 to the Italian Diaspora too every year.. no mencions that Italy now is the new ''Spain'' to give the 12 points to Romania.
"So called professionals" aren't there to please your butt and vote how YOU want.Either way, it's clear the juries are also failing to vote on the song...and giving points to their neighbours as they always used to do in the past.
IMO the juries should consist of fans of the Eurovision who care about the best songs and performances doing well...not "professionals" who only care about high fiving their neighbours and marking down the competition.
I find it hard to believe that we can put cultural differences aside when judging the songs and performances, yet so called professionals cannot.