ESC United Mod Team
Super Moderator
- Joined
- February 10, 2021
- Posts
- 214
Last edited by a moderator:
Stefan managed to get 12 in the televote from Armenia last year just for being ethnically Armenian I think if a commentator mentions it could absolutely influence serbian votingWhy do you think so. I mean only because she has got balkan roots, I don't think she is well known in ?
Well yes, true that, it could happen but I somehow think that this effect would not be so strong in . But we will seeStefan managed to get 12 in the televote from Armenia last year just for being ethnically Armenian I think if a commentator mentions it could absolutely influence serbian voting
Why should they write articles about unofficial buzz when we get the official announcement anyway next week?I think it's crazy how the ESC media is ignoring all the buzz and it's also sad, because they are not independent and cancellable by the EBU.
I think it's crazy how the ESC media is ignoring all the buzz and it's also sad, because they are not independent and cancellable by the EBU.
That's literally what he said
Or at least i have interpreted it that way
The correct answer is that most ESC fansites and media are terrified of losing their accreditation as it is, they're certainly not going to report on leaks and spoilers and risk the EBU striking them from media lists.
The problem is that mountain Germans are only good at PR. We convinced the world that the guy from Braunau was German and Beethoven was Austrian.
I think the most similar neighbour to Austria is Slovenia followed by the Czechia.Haha, ain't that the truth Also never forget Christoph Waltz' legendary take:
But to be on-topic; I love the contrast where I talked with a few people about potential Austrian candidates like Visions of Atlantis a few pages prior; and now we're faced with this. ORF's theme this year apparently is go hard or go home
the winners since 2010, thanks to juries, are way more decent and relevant, and so Eurovision as a whole.
I heavily disagree with you on this one.
The juries weren´t the reason why most winners won - the winners from 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2017, 2018 would have won wihtout the juries anway. How did juries had any impact on making the winners "more decent and relevant"?
They didn´t really change the finalists (apart from 1-2 songs max. per semi) and they didn´t change the winners (apart from 2015 and 2019).
Personally, I´m curious about the new voting system because I think that Eurovision - as a whole - has changed and it has become more relevant in Central European/Western countries as well (charts (prior-Spotify-era))... like I said, "funny/joke entries" have become less popular in the late 00´s and even got snubbed by televoters... juries might have voted for some quality entries over the years but they also supported many generic pop songs and neglected songs which were more experimental, progressive and even contemporary.
If submits a stupid/silly track, it´s up to their broadcaster not because of the "new rule". submitted "Woki mit dem Popo" in 2012 (when juries were still around).
But that is precisely the point.But they still had a massive impact on the results. not everything is about winning. Maro and Amanda, also S10 would not have done as well as they did without the juries, which I'd think it would be unfair.
But that is precisely the point.
These entries would have done exactly the same in the current system. They would have made it out of the semi-finals, and they would get exactly the same placements in the final. Maybe even a bit higher actually, because Albania and Cyprus probably would get nearly 0 from the juries in the final, and thus Azerbaijan and Switzerland's jury points would have to be redistributed among the jury darlings anyway.
In fact, entries of these types, which are strong enough to do well with televoters in the semi-finals anyway, are the ones that will benefit the most from this change, because if anything they'll have less competition for the jury votes in the final.
Oh yeah, absolutely. These countries have a easier time grabbing that televoting 10th place when their entries are weaker, for sure.oh yeah don't get me wrong i don't mind the change that much... i was just talking about the comment that juries didn't change anything.
i am worried however that this rule does benefit countries such as serbia, albania, lithuania... since some of them have 12 points on lock from certain countries.
But they still had a massive impact on the results. not everything is about winning. Maro and Amanda, also S10 would not have done as well as they did without the juries, which I'd think it would be unfair.
i am worried however that this rule does benefit countries such as serbia, albania, lithuania... since some of them have 12 points on lock from certain countries.
Once it's in your head it stays there right? That's already a good thing for Eurovision. This either becomes the trainwreck of the year or it's going to be an iconic Eurovision moment. I think we will be entertained either way...Poe, Poe, Poe, Poe, Poe, Edgar Allan, Edgar Allan...
Once it's in your head it stays there right? That's already a good thing for Eurovision. This either becomes the trainwreck of the year or it's going to be an iconic Eurovision moment. I think we will be entertained either way...