Preuss
Well-known member
- Joined
- April 19, 2015
- Posts
- 3,145
The Thing is Australia got 3 Times in 4 years the latest possible Draw which is not fair. There was no Justification for giving her #9 in the Semi or Guy #13 in the Final. Regarding Isaiah.... The ridicuous Thing is, even if the Televoter gave him 0 Points in the Semi and in the Final, he would have ended up 9th Place, so the Televoter never had a chance to make him ending up worse. Objectively viewed there is nothing that justifies giving him more Points than Italy, Hungary, Romania or Moldova. I mean everything is solid-ok on him and his entry, but nothing is outstanding about the whole Package. And this went too far. As I said, I can understand if someone put him #5-6 in his Ranking (which would lead to around 120-130 Points in the Juryvoting instead of 171), but Many people had him Top3 and this is not objective. Jessicas Juryvoting is almost fair (regarding that her Juryperformance was much better), but also here I question People who put her Top3. Maybe she should have around 10-20 Points less and it would be ok.
Regarding Sweden, there is no clear Bias. Malena, Anna, Eric, Loreen and Frans did all worse with the Juries than the Televoters while Robin, Sanna, Mans, Robin and Benjamin did better, so overall this is fair. Benjamins Song had juryfriendlyness written all over it. In ESCforum even many haters predicted his Top5 Finish in the Juryvote (even before he won MF), so the Theory that the Juries voted for Benjamin because hes from Sweden is ridiculous.
Dami won her semifinal, and you think it's wrong that she got to perform as number 13...? Okay let's say that your precious Benjamin won the 2nd semi final and he was set to perform as third.. well you'd like that, wouldn't you? Because considering that you don't find it fair that Dami performed as 13th after winning her semifinal, this shouldn't bother you either, no?
With respect, but not better than Hungary, Moldova or Romania...? I'm pleased with their results, but I'm pretty sure many juries ranked Australia worse than those country you mentioned; Hungary, Moldova and Romania. As I've said before, Australia got fourth because they consistently did well with the juries, while Hungary, Moldova and Romania did not.. Deal with it, this is an important part as well to appeal to a majority of hte juries. You're saying "objectively"; I'm saying my ass. You are being highly subjetive in your opinion, because I DON'T ever believe that you can gather 200 music professionals and everyone would rank Romania over Australia because it's "objectively" to rank joik over "Don't Come Easy". And I'm not a hater of Romania's entry btw, just saying that 200 music professionals would not rank Romania over Australia, and this was proven during the jury voting.
At the end of the day, it's not possible in Eurovision jury voting that over 200 music professional's gonna rank the songs the same, because they are humans and humans are subjective when it comes to their taste of music. And come on, Realest, many jury members appreciate well produced pop songs with a slick staging, something your own Benjamin benefited from this year.
I’m a bit confused. You're ending your post with stating that Benjamin got his points due to the song (which I also believe btw) and not because he's from Sweden. Still you think that Australia's entries are being pushed big time by the juries in this contest...? :?