LalehForWD
Active member
Maybe it's because of the central fact that many people long for in art: you want to get presented something originally created by the artist because you feel that this is sort of an invitation to his/her world, which creates intimacy or a sort of feeling you are close to him/her. Which is always a nice experience - getting in touch with another human being (or in the case of the artist - have the impression to get in touch with him). So the lesser things there are in the production around him or her (lightning, show, technique...) the more "naked", the more "exposed to our eyes and ears", the artist presents him/herself. Whereas some might get the feeling of being distant to the artist because of the many things that come in between him (his song/his presence as a person on stage) and us - the audience. We might have the "disguised" / "masked" impression instead of the one I described before. So we don't really feel invited to his world, but rather left outside. One can still enjoy this construction around the artist for its professionally, for its aesthetic appeal or for many other reasons as they may in fact - as you pointed out - demand a great amount of skills and devotion. But if this construction covers the artist in a way that you can change him/her for another and you wouldn't notice this change, then people might loose the interest - which is unfair to the hard working artist, but understandable because the audience has lost the connection to him/her as a person.
But this is of course only one way to judge the quality of art, one can go for the technical skills, for the authenticity, for the mere aesthetic pleasure - neither of them seems to me more or less valid, than the others.
Thanks, [MENTION=13155]Sammy[/MENTION]. If I understood you right, one way to judge quality is to look for the art or expression of feelings of an act. I agree completely with this. The expression consists of course of the audio, the sound pieces of the song, but in Eurovision, there's also the visual performance and even the imaginary private impression you get from the lyrics. The personal relation to the artist aspect you're talking about, it must be a typical esc fan feature, right? This is another level of some kind of private imaginary value. The truer open and honest personality, the better or whatever your preferences lie. It could be a funny or sexy personality for example. Here I'm not so sure I agree. At least not when it comes to Eurovision, possibly because I'm probably not being a completely devoted esc fan. But then again, who is?
I'd say POP is the art of combining the well known into new sensations. It is not an easy or a self-evident task. It takes many types of skills and experiences to do good POP. You can say this is more of a craftsmanship rather than art. Sure, but sometimes it can get magical and then per definition as an expression of feelings, it is true art.
For those who refuse to see values in other music genres other than according to their own preferences, I'd say - Yass for complete dominance of fast food POP music in Eurovision!!