FoxOfShadows
Well-known member
- Joined
- September 19, 2013
- Posts
- 1,532
Because we did so well in 2009, 2010 and 2013.
To be fair you were third with the juries in 2013
Because we did so well in 2009, 2010 and 2013.
To be fair you were third with the juries in 2013
May people never forget the real winner. I don't know guys maybe we were right to complain
Turkey was always right.
I can't understand still how the whole jury picked Sweden over Italy? I though they were "classy" They look like more tenegeers .
The one good thing that came from this is proof that non-English songs still can do well at Eurovision so we may see an influx of them in the future. Of course that also would have happened if Italy had won...
The one good thing that came from this is proof that non-English songs still can do well at Eurovision so we may see an influx of them in the future. Of course that also would have happened if Italy had won...
One explanation that non-english songs can do good is that they are a little bit 'unique', especially in a year with only 4 songs like that. Back when there was the language rule, UK was always doing good. Isn't really a coincidence that UK is doing trashy ever since the rule was abolished?
But people weren't voting i guess?
The juries are still people, not gods as they claim
The juries are still people, not gods as they claim
They clearly play gods now