I did not like the voting structure. 3 mixed + 2 televoting-only qualifiers seems very poorly balanced. Jury impact overall is minimal, why have them at all? Especially when they mentioned that it was the biggest jury so far with 25 members. Either respect the jury or get rid of it.
I did not like that even before the show began they revealed the favourites of some of the jury members. One of the jurors even mentioned that it was based on the studio versions before seeing the live performance, so what was the point of that reveal?
I did not like how they randomly revealed how many times some of the artists got maximum points from jury members. Again, what was the point of this reveal? We can extrapolate some data from it, but in general, being a favourite of one jury member doesn't really tell us if they did well or poorly overall with jury voting.
Based on what we know, Ewert and the Two Dragons were probably the big winners with the jury who helped them qualify, whereas the second televoting round, where each televote is multiple times more significant then in the first round, allowed some complete random like Peter Põder qualify. I find it hard to believe that he would have been anywhere near the televoting top 5 in the first round.