I'm sorry everyone. Forgot about that. Won't happen again.
May I just make a little remark to the moderators here: I got a kind reminder from you that I should not ask here for links to download / share songs because it's against the forum rules. You were right to do so (even if I was not thinking of it, in that case I was just wanted to know if anyone knew if a youtube link for the Montenegrin studio version existed but the formulation of my question was misleading.)! So yes, you were right to remind me to be more careful on this matter.
On the other hand you open a poll for a song that hasn't been officially released yet. Isn't that an invitation to stream/share an illegally published song?
I mean - I'd LOVE to give points to it, but I didn't hear the song yet and I'm not sure if I can ask anyone here to tell me where I can listen to it without again breaking the forum rules.
Will be interesting to see if Australia once again can get away with sending uninspired blandness to the contest and those so called "experts" in the juries will push them once again?
And these so called "experts" benefits Sweden as well
I mean, Guy Sebastian deserved his points from the juries and Dami deserved to win it... Isaiah got maybe a bit too many points, but I get why they liked him considering the weak year
And these so called "experts" benefits Sweden as well
I mean, Guy Sebastian deserved his points from the juries and Dami deserved to win it... Isaiah got maybe a bit too many points, but I get why they liked him considering the weak year
Sometimes Sweden suffers with Juries, sometimes Sweden benefits. Thats how it should be. Sweden is rather a Juryfriendly Country thats right, but its not nearly in the same League like Australia. You cant say its fair that Australia gets 224/311/171 Jurypoints while the Public only gives 132/191/2 Points.
Classic Eurovision fan to whine when the juries give low points to their favorites but shut up when their favorite a push by the jury, meanwhile the televoter goes unpunished. Whoever said the jury had to match the public opinion?
Classic Eurovision fan to whine when the juries give low points to their favorites but shut up when their favorite a push by the jury, meanwhile the televoter goes unpunished. Whoever said the jury had to match the public opinion? Australia has been the jury favorite so far because they've sent modern western pop.
And besides, the idea that a country gets points because the country has some kind of status is dead. There is so much evidence speaking against it.
but those juries are support to be some sort of music "experts" aren't they? shouldn't we expect "more" from them than than the average voter? and also aren't we allow to look more critical at a small group of people that have in practice more power over the outcome than the votes of millions? ... but hey if people still want to believe that there isn't a certain bias which is pushing Australia in this, then go on live in delusion...
But yeah we can "pretend" that Isaiah was top material and that Dami's standard ballad was some sort of "second coming" and deserved 100+ points more than the follow up
I wasn't just talking about your dislike against the juries. First of all, your argument builds on the belief that there is an objective ranking of what is quality or not. You can't state x song is better than y without being subjective. It would even be required that there is some kind of official ranking or list made by Eurovision fans to decide if the juries have made the right decisions or not. If your argument is about the concept of juries, it's a bit late to complain in 2018 and not 2009 (but what do I know if you did?).
There have always been theories that a certain country is being favored just because of it's status, and they all die when that country eventually flops and new theories rise to the surface about a certain country being favored.
sweden has not suffered with a jury relagive to their final placement since 2011Sometimes Sweden suffers with Juries, sometimes Sweden benefits. Thats how it should be. Sweden is rather a Juryfriendly Country thats right, but its not nearly in the same League like Australia. You cant say its fair that Australia gets 224/311/171 Jurypoints while the Public only gives 132/191/2 Points.
Demo? Shazam says no
sweden has not suffered with a jury relagive to their final placement since 2011
sweden has shaped the current direction of the contest ever since loreen won and australia gets the same push for doing the same kind of music, i doubt it is related to politics
also those first two are not bad televote results