Just as with Malta, this song sounds like a huge step backwards in terms of competitiveness to me compared to their previous two efforts. Very noughties in style and forgettable. Even a good staging could not save it from falling flat IMO.
The Netherlands: "Shalalie" composer Pierre Kartner hates Trijntje's song | Eurovision 2015 Predictions, Polls, Odds, Rankings | wiwibloggs
Well I've seen more mature article authors... What Pierre says about the song is 100% true, it is far to repetitive and needs polishing to make it a hell of a lot better. And it probably was a cast off put back into the song file.
The Netherlands: "Shalalie" composer Pierre Kartner hates Trijntje's song | Eurovision 2015 Predictions, Polls, Odds, Rankings | wiwibloggs
Well I've seen more mature article authors... What Pierre says about the song is 100% true, it is far to repetitive and needs polishing to make it a hell of a lot better. And it probably was a cast off put back into the song file.
To be fair, the article's certainly right in pointing out Pierre's hypocrisy - it's kind of amusing to see someone who's written a mediocre, repetitive song calling out another song for being mediocre and repetitive. That doesn't make his observations wrong, though, and the article's definitely been made by scraping the bottom of the barrel on a relatively slow news day. There's calling out someone on their hypocrisy, and then there's riding on the coattails of that observation to fanboy over an entry and get page views with worthless writing. The poll at the end seemed particularly cringeworthy - of course the result will favour Trijntje, due to recency bias if nothing else, and they'd have known that, so the whole thing just reeks of 'please, justify my opinion! Agree with me!'
But my question is, is that journalism? I mean, if you are working for a site that is writing articles, then you are a journalist and a journalist should try to be as objective as possible. I don't mind writing an article about this, it is still a quite wellknown dutch songwriter that participated in Eurovision before that comes with cristism for the dutch entry, but this is filled with speculation, opinion and pointing fingers, something a "journalist" shouldn't do (unless you don't write a chronicle where you are allowed to write opionions. Why I am discussing this matter is that I have myself studied journalism and know a little about it and that sites like these is destroying Eurovisions reputation, which still has a bad reputation in quite many countries (even in countries where it is still quite popular like Sweden).