Re: THE 2012 'EXPERT' PANEL - SWEDEN
So you don't agree with (some of) my ratings. So what? It's just natural that you won't achieve consensus between all members of the forum on each of the 42 entries. Just look at the "angry mob" votes, for every single song you will find scores ranging from 0 to 5.
Again, I can't possibly cover all aspects of a performance in the review. But what I can do is trying to take as much as possible into account when rating an entry. The rating is not based on the review. Nor is the review necessary based on the rating, as a matter of fact.
That's your opinion. My opinion differs from yours.
Nope, I'm not from Italy, and I can assure you that I take my job seriously and when judging the songs I'm as impartial and unbiased as I can be.
So explain the low rankings for the other faves, escpecially Sweden? BTW, you still haven't explain why you haven't compared Zilli to Winehouse when you compared Loreen to Kate Bush. Today it's worse to copy Winehouse than Bush since Winehouse were active as artist to her death.
It's strange that Sweden who get top scores everywhere now suddenly get a 2 from you. Especially when you gave low points to other faves as Serbia and Iceland.
Yes, it's YOUR opinion. Why should we take it seriously when you give 2 points to a entry that most people give top scores??
This is also why I dislike this type of threads because it depends on few peoples opinions.
But I'm not surprised. This is how this forum works. Sweden is being put down because it's Sweden and because we are the favorite. It's prety sad.