I asked Chatgpt to score the lyrics using different criteria, and this is what it said:
Depth:
The lyrics use the idea of revolution and change as a rallying cry, but they don’t dig into any nuanced ideas or complex emotions. The message is straightforward rather than layered.
Score: 3/10
Lyrical Complexity:
The language is very simple and relies heavily on repetition. While repetition can be effective in anthemic or chant-like contexts, here it limits the complexity and variety of imagery or ideas.
Score: 2/10
Emotional Resonance:
The repeated phrases like People that will change the world and revolution might spark a motivational feeling in some listeners, yet the overall effect is generic. It may energize a crowd but doesn’t evoke a deep emotional journey.
Score: 4/10
Originality:
The theme of revolution and world change is a common one in inspirational music. The phrasing is familiar rather than innovative, which detracts from its uniqueness.
Score: 3/10
Structure and Cohesion:
The structure is very repetitive. There is a slight progression in the final stanza that hints at a long-awaited change, but overall, the repetitive nature makes it feel more like a chant than a fully developed narrative.
Score: 3/10
Overall Score:
Averaging these aspects gives an overall score of about 3/10. The lyrics function well as a simple, anthemic call to action but fall short in depth, complexity, and originality.
Even Chatgpt thinks the lyrics are generic

