RainyWoods
Croak-kay
The German jury were weird... 22nd for Ukraine.. 14th for San Marino
12th for Norway in the semi
12th for Norway in the semiSplit results Televotings & 'Jury'
- Thread starter CC92
- Start date
- Watchers 24
A-lister
Veteran
- Joined
- December 28, 2009
- Posts
- 32,825
The outfit and styling (except for hair and make-up) was terrible yes....
the song however one of the BEST this years and her vocals performance aswell...
shakirpashov
Member
- Joined
- May 4, 2013
- Posts
- 4
Montenegro got robbed.
Somebody
Member
- Joined
- March 8, 2012
- Posts
- 223
lucian-crusher
Well-known member
Well, it makes sence as the telvoting was 100 % like this: 1. ; 2. ; 3. ; 4. . But I really think our jury was not fair. They played as dirty as the juries from , , and . Why would you put that low being the country with he biggest Diaspora here? Wasn't that om purpose, because you knew they woukd be Top 3 in televoting whatever they send?
; 2. ; 3. ; 4. . But I really think our jury was not fair. They played as dirty as the juries from , , and . Why would you put that low being the country with he biggest Diaspora here? Wasn't that om purpose, because you knew they woukd be Top 3 in televoting whatever they send?
shakirpashov
Member
- Joined
- May 4, 2013
- Posts
- 4
Dear Jon Ola Sand,
(or Jean-Paul Philippot, or whomever decides how stuff is done in the ESC)...
I know you, or some of your people are reading this forum. I hope this message reaches your eyes.
The televoting represents the collective opinion of 700 million people. The juries are only 100 or so. I can't stress enough how much that is unfair. Sure, those 100 people know how to decode any system that represents aurally perceived music through the use of written symbols with their eyes, by "reading" those symbols, and they also use fancy terms like "c minor" and "a-flat major", but after those jury votes came out, I'm not really sure if those people still know how to recieve brain-pleasure (generate serotonin) by listening to music.
I would like to offer you the following solutions to this problem:
Solution #1 - Make only the televoting count and create a separate award for the juries to award to their favorite song. This will lead to us to having two Eurovision winners each year, which I think is a positive thing.
Solution #2 - Make the jury consist of past Eurovision winners only. That way we will know who to blame on the internet for any unsatisfactory results.
Solution #3 - Return to the previous system. It was quite good.
You're welcome,
Ryo.
P.S. - My eloquent advice is not free. I expect a PM with Emmelie de Forest's phone number and/or other contact details. She seems to be a very nice girl. I would very much like to see "Man Of Steel" with her. After that we may grab something to eat too. I hope she is a fan of kebab.
(or Jean-Paul Philippot, or whomever decides how stuff is done in the ESC)...
I know you, or some of your people are reading this forum. I hope this message reaches your eyes.
The televoting represents the collective opinion of 700 million people. The juries are only 100 or so. I can't stress enough how much that is unfair. Sure, those 100 people know how to decode any system that represents aurally perceived music through the use of written symbols with their eyes, by "reading" those symbols, and they also use fancy terms like "c minor" and "a-flat major", but after those jury votes came out, I'm not really sure if those people still know how to recieve brain-pleasure (generate serotonin) by listening to music.
I would like to offer you the following solutions to this problem:
Solution #1 - Make only the televoting count and create a separate award for the juries to award to their favorite song. This will lead to us to having two Eurovision winners each year, which I think is a positive thing.
Solution #2 - Make the jury consist of past Eurovision winners only. That way we will know who to blame on the internet for any unsatisfactory results.
Solution #3 - Return to the previous system. It was quite good.
You're welcome,
Ryo.
P.S. - My eloquent advice is not free. I expect a PM with Emmelie de Forest's phone number and/or other contact details. She seems to be a very nice girl. I would very much like to see "Man Of Steel" with her. After that we may grab something to eat too. I hope she is a fan of kebab.
What's its original source? It should come from the broadcaster in one way or another. I don't want to add potentially made-up votes to my scoresheet.
I've seen, do they belong to the Romanian broadcaster?
So i received an email from someone claiming that was the result of the french televote
01 Hungary
02 Russia
03 Moldova
04 Azerbaijan
05 Greece
06 Belgium
07 Italy
08 Denmark
10 Romania
12 Armenia
I have NO claim those are true. France 3 never reavealed the televote before and my sources are just a mail probably sent by someone from this forum as a joke).
01 Hungary
02 Russia
03 Moldova
04 Azerbaijan
05 Greece
06 Belgium
07 Italy
08 Denmark
10 Romania
12 Armenia
I have NO claim those are true. France 3 never reavealed the televote before and my sources are just a mail probably sent by someone from this forum as a joke
).
Jeansy
Active member
- Joined
- March 10, 2013
- Posts
- 635
So from what I can gather from this thread Denmark never really won the peoples Eurovision, and it's only because of some super elite people who might not even have be legally allowed to be judges, that got them 1st place, might as well not offer people the chance to vote next year.