Contact us

SPAIN 2012 - Pastora Soler - Quédate conmigo

How do you rate the entry?

  • 12

    202 48.6%
  • 10

    54 13.0%
  • 08

    34 8.2%
  • 07

    32 7.7%
  • 06

    15 3.6%
  • 05

    22 5.3%
  • 04

    9 2.2%
  • 03

    9 2.2%
  • 02

    8 1.9%
  • 01

    3 0.7%
  • 00

    28 6.7%

  • Total voters
    416

Mozz

Well-known member
Joined
February 23, 2011
Posts
11,249
Sorry to bother, but does one of you have the link for the scoreboard for the final (that shows all the countries' votes)?
 

Franco

Well-known member
Joined
February 21, 2012
Posts
4,372
Location
Church of Valentina

Logichno

Member
Joined
May 22, 2012
Posts
19
She was my winner. I didn't like her dress and the lights, but her singing gave me chills.
 

gustav

Active member
Joined
May 7, 2011
Posts
1,239
It was the best entry for you and for Portugal. Therefore it got 12 points. What else are you expecting?
 

Miguel

Active member
Joined
February 20, 2012
Posts
2,159
Location
.pt
It was the best entry for you and for Portugal. Therefore it got 12 points. What else are you expecting?

Can you stop, please? You did something similar in the Portuguese thread. It's an opinion. Some people can't really face some opinions.
And at least Portugal has good taste. That's why "Quédate Conmigo" got 12 points. LOL!
 

Musicosity

Active member
Joined
February 22, 2011
Posts
3,109
I didn't like her wavy ballroom dress, and her hair in a bun looked Victorian. The act was just too typical Eurovision. The way she was looking during the rehearsals in a more casual-looking dress and her hair in a tail would've been better, I think.
I think you have a point here. If there was something to improve in the final performance it was the visuals. Her hairstyle, her facial expression and her arm movements should have been less stiff and austere. With the dress I had no problem, I found it quite fitting to the way she performed.

Another reason I see for not ending higher is what I previously wrote when this entry was announced: the composition is too much of a stereotypical ballad, where you know that near the end there will be a climax with lots of belting. It sounds too perfectly composed, the composition is almost too cold and clinical, so to say. I'm not sure if Eurovision viewers want that anymore. I think that played a role too.
Your description of a stereotypical ballad fits to songs like Yohanna's Is it true, for example, but I see Quédate conmigo as a different type of composition. In fact, Quédate reminds me very much of Ravel's Boléro: One musical theme starting quietly and repeating several times with steadily increasing intensity in voice and accompaniment until it reaches full orchestral power and resolves in a dramatic key change. I think this pronounced arc of suspense right from the start is not a stereotypical ballad form, just like Boléro is not a stereotypical classic orchestral piece. They both appear at the horizon, so to speak, close in and steamroll almost relentlessly over the listener at the end. Maybe this is what you meant with cold and clinical?
 

JuhaJaara

Member
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
8
as I was watching Pastora, I also felt that it was all just too stiff and too classic.

Another reason I see for not ending higher is what I previously wrote when this entry was announced: the composition is too much of a stereotypical ballad, where you know that near the end there will be a climax with lots of belting. It sounds too perfectly composed, the composition is almost too cold and clinical, so to say. I'm not sure if Eurovision viewers want that anymore.

I guess you are in right here. Being a stereotypical Eurivision ballad, Quédate conmigo was one of our (=Finland's) jury favourites, but televoters probably gave it no points at all. Pastora is a top class singer, her song unfotunately was too ordinary. I think instead of ordering their song from a famous ESc composer, Spain should try some real Spanish music next time, as they have an interesting music tradition of their own. Anyhow, thanks for using Spanish language once again!
 

Matt

Admin Schmadmin
Staff member
Joined
June 1, 2009
Posts
23,479
Location
Los Angeles, USA
Considering Spain didn't want to win and a lot of commentators pointed that out during the live show I think a 10th place isn't that shabby after all. And we know they won't withdraw and the broadcaster have been quite vocal about that so I'm confident that this is only the beginning of a winning streak for Spain.
 

Meiaro

Member
Joined
February 27, 2012
Posts
82
^
I think too that stating how Spain was scared to win is the reason why they just got 10th.
I mean, they had a fantastic position, with such a great voice reaching the highest top right close to the bottom of the show.
With such a Sanremo-style entry I expected Italy to give'em about 8 points (10-12 to the countries of diaspora), but after listening from our host that apparently, Pastora was asked not to do her best and avoid to win...
I gave my vote anyway, but no surprise that people didn't want to cause damage. At least I guess that's what they thought, I really can't explain it otherwise. :|
 

Jesus

Active member
Joined
April 16, 2011
Posts
609
Location
Madrid
Considering Spain didn't want to win and a lot of commentators pointed that out during the live show I think a 10th place isn't that shabby after all. And we know they won't withdraw and the broadcaster have been quite vocal about that so I'm confident that this is only the beginning of a winning streak for Spain.
That's false and you should know it. A Spanish (and stupid) reporter wrote in ABC (Spanish newspaper) that she was told not to win, but afterwards Pastora told everyone that that's NOT true. And obviously, a lot of commentators from a lot of countries told the audience not to vote for Spain. It is incredible that commentators tried to influence people's voting, and it's worse than that, because it was something that indeed Pastora never said. :mad:oOXoOX:mad:
 

Misi

Active member
Joined
September 28, 2009
Posts
795
Location
Lehistan
I saw how my Spanish friends were proud about Pastora and really, everybody that I know watched it.
I hope you can get some hope from that. For different things!

She was amazing.

PS: Don't win the Euro;)
 

une

Active member
Joined
January 17, 2011
Posts
1,479
While I thought that the camera was a bit static, rather than Pastora, I expected something very special at the long note, but the camera just stayed there and didn't move, taking the magic off that high ending....
 

Meiaro

Member
Joined
February 27, 2012
Posts
82
@ Jesus
I want to specify that our broadcaster never told us not to vote for Spain. I remember he talked about this fact as if he was sincere and disinterested. During the night he showed a lot of respect for Pastora's performance (he wasn't so kind with many trashy songs). Surely he wasn't shamelessly supporting Spain like Raffaella Carrà did last year, but sometimes he seemed to have a soft spot for you.
I think he really didn't know the truth whatever it is but yes, clean or not, commentators made a mistake by talking about that.
 

Musicosity

Active member
Joined
February 22, 2011
Posts
3,109
The German commentator lost no word about this do-not-win affair, and I do not remember seeing it appear anywhere else in German media. And yet Germany gave no points to Spain, I am embarrassed to say. So these alleged comments were obviously not necessary for the voters to ignore Pastora.
 

Mozz

Well-known member
Joined
February 23, 2011
Posts
11,249
I think you have a point here. If there was something to improve in the final performance it was the visuals. Her hairstyle, her facial expression and her arm movements should have been less stiff and austere. With the dress I had no problem, I found it quite fitting to the way she performed.

Your description of a stereotypical ballad fits to songs like Yohanna's Is it true, for example, but I see Quédate conmigo as a different type of composition. In fact, Quédate reminds me very much of Ravel's Boléro: One musical theme starting quietly and repeating several times with steadily increasing intensity in voice and accompaniment until it reaches full orchestral power and resolves in a dramatic key change. I think this pronounced arc of suspense right from the start is not a stereotypical ballad form, just like Boléro is not a stereotypical classic orchestral piece. They both appear at the horizon, so to speak, close in and steamroll almost relentlessly over the listener at the end. Maybe this is what you meant with cold and clinical?

Maybe. I'm not sure how to explain myself in clear words... It can be compared with 'surprises that in some situations like nowadays are no longer true surprises because they've become predictable surprises'. The key change in Quedate Conmigo is fantastic and was handled perfectly by Pastora, but was it really a surprise, was it something (together with the whole performance, and all the visual aspects) something that the Eurovision voter in 2012 would vote for? To me the song seems a bit planned, specially written to evoke emotions, with 'the right surprise' (the key change) that is actually no longer a surprise no matter how stunning and how technically well sung. Result: the ability to evoke emotions is less in this ballad. For some reason the other ballads like Kuula and Serbia's (and especially Suus) sound purer (to me).

So it has not so much to do with the type of composition of the ballad (how it is built up etc. like you describe it), but more with the intention behind it (when it was written). And the song, the end result, breaths that intention.

That is why some people, including me, are saying that spontaneously written songs are the best ones. Because it contains less thought and planning but more feelings and purity. For me, Quedate Conmigo, does not sound so spontaneous. It does not mean that I think it's a bad or unlikeable song! The truth is: I like it. But I just don't have strong feelings when listening to it.

Hmm, I think I've actually just managed to make myself clear ;)
 
Top Bottom