Contact us

SLOVENIA 2012 - Eva Boto - Verjamem

How do you rate the entry?

  • 12

    130 39.0%
  • 10

    45 13.5%
  • 08

    25 7.5%
  • 07

    31 9.3%
  • 06

    20 6.0%
  • 05

    22 6.6%
  • 04

    14 4.2%
  • 03

    9 2.7%
  • 02

    10 3.0%
  • 01

    5 1.5%
  • 00

    22 6.6%

  • Total voters
    333

CC92

Well-known member
Joined
May 31, 2011
Posts
7,684
Location
Berlin
Re: SLOVENIA 2012

[...] so we just need a good song! :D

Exactly. But that is not a 'just' thing. It is the factor that decides about 95% of the outcome. American Idol format is totally out of place here. Unfortunately that is the effect of 'jury' voting at ESC where the songs play a minor role. STOP IT!
 

Kryptonite

Well-known member
Joined
December 12, 2010
Posts
6,170
Location
Slovenia
Re: SLOVENIA 2012

Exactly. But that is not a 'just' thing. It is the factor that decides about 95% of the outcome. American Idol format is totally out of place here. Unfortunately that is the effect of 'jury' voting at ESC where the songs play a minor role. STOP IT!

I totally agree with you. I should write "JUST", because it's kind of easy to find a good singer in Slovenia, but it's hard to find a good song. I like this system anyways, because we'll probably get some new, young artists.
 

Charly

Well-known member
Joined
December 3, 2010
Posts
7,126
Location
UK - Morocco
Re: SLOVENIA 2012

I just heard the 4 artists which is Safe and they were good :D
 

Kryptonite

Well-known member
Joined
December 12, 2010
Posts
6,170
Location
Slovenia
Re: SLOVENIA 2012

Videos
- Qualifiers -

Brina Vidic - You know I'm no good


Nadja Irgolič - The climb


Aljoša Keber - Grenade


Klemen Orter - Somewhere over the rainbow


- non-qualifiers -​

Biba & Bibitas - Moonriver


Tamara Goričanec - Ključ do srca


Sylvo - Tainted love


Janja Kobale - Rolling in the deep

 

AlekS

Veteran
Joined
October 1, 2009
Posts
26,872
Location
Ukraine
Re: SLOVENIA 2012

Exactly. But that is not a 'just' thing. It is the factor that decides about 95% of the outcome. American Idol format is totally out of place here. Unfortunately that is the effect of 'jury' voting at ESC where the songs play a minor role. STOP IT!
Such a *drama* :twisted:
I can say the same about your own taste (yep, without even knowing you).


95%. How did you come up with that figure? Is there a formula?
Why do you speak for myself and generalize in such way? I value performer, I value performance... not just a song.



American Idol format existed in ESC NFs even before the juries have been introduced again so "unfortunately that is the effect of 'jury' voting" thing doesn't work.

ps. I respect Slovenian broadcaster and I don't order/judge anyone how to choose performers.
 
Last edited:

CC92

Well-known member
Joined
May 31, 2011
Posts
7,684
Location
Berlin
Re: SLOVENIA 2012

95%. How did you come up with that figure? Is there a formula?
No.:lol: What I wanted to say is just that people vote for the song or the overall impression and not the best voice. Let us say a good salesman can sell a paper-clip for a higher prize than a bad salesman. But when the bad salesman has a rough diamant to sell he will earn more. So is Eurovision (salesman = the artist; ware = the song). Hence I believe it is wasted Energy to focus on the singer only but to forget (almost) about the song.

Why do you speak for myself and generalize in such way? I value performer, I value performance... not just a song.
Well, when speaking about the people, the voters and often also about the the songs of course I do so in general. If you value the choreography, vocals or whatever on an extra level then you are an exception I guess. As it is called song contest most people seem to understand it like that and concentrate on the song letting the performance just have an (unintentional) impact on the impression. Highly unlikely people would have voted Sweden to a second or first place and at the same time placed Austria second-last if they had been asked to judge Eric's and Nadine's vocal skills. At least according to my observations.

American Idol format existed in ESC NFs even before the juries have been introduced again so "unfortunately that is the effect of 'jury' voting" thing doesn't work.
Has it? When you say so it will be like that but I just see Croatian Dora went Idol, Slovenian EMA was replaced with Idol, BBC tried Idol in 2009 and 2010, Germany comes up with Idol. That all happened after the jury's come back. Probably there have been one or two pre-selections with idol format in years 1998-2008 (honestly I am not an uberexpert here) but I doubt it was popular to that extent it is at the moment. But again, feel free to disabuse me here.
 

CC92

Well-known member
Joined
May 31, 2011
Posts
7,684
Location
Berlin
Re: SLOVENIA 2012

Excuse my mistakes once again. Unfortunately I cannot edit my messages after reacting.
 

AlekS

Veteran
Joined
October 1, 2009
Posts
26,872
Location
Ukraine
Re: SLOVENIA 2012

No.:lol: What I wanted to say is just that people vote for the song or the overall impression and not the best voice. Let us say a good salesman can sell a paper-clip for a higher prize than a bad salesman. But when the bad salesman has a rough diamant to sell he will earn more. So is Eurovision (salesman = the artist; ware = the song). Hence I believe it is wasted Energy to focus on the singer only but to forget (almost) about the song.
This comparison with diamonds is useless.
Awesome performer can save the worst and the most primitive song but if the best song is being performed by a sucky, the most horrible performer - nothing can save it. You can spend few billion euros but this won't help xshrug
I say performing is more important - what seems primitive in the beginning can be changed by performance, even the lyrics can sound differently.
Standing on 1 place and performing the best song in the world means zero if it's lifeless performance.
Seriously I can roar/rape the best song in the world... vote for me! :cool:



Well, when speaking about the people, the voters and often also about the the songs of course I do so in general. If you value the choreography, vocals or whatever on an extra level then you are an exception I guess. As it is called song contest most people seem to understand it like that and concentrate on the song letting the performance just have an (unintentional) impact on the impression. Highly unlikely people would have voted Sweden to a second or first place and at the same time placed Austria second-last if they had been asked to judge Eric's and Nadine's vocal skills. At least according to my observations.
If you think that I'm exception I have a news for you.
It's also called Eurovision, and it stands in the beginning - before the "song", no need in closing your eyes on that ;)
And we don't judge just vocals so your comparison is useless, again. The jury also voted for Eric Saade if you remember correctly. But I don't think that he finished where he finished only because of the song. He had gimmick performance, dancers, he danced himself etc., he's a young cutie with Arabian roots. The song only? Nah! :lol:

Same goes to every performer, Slovenian too. It's not 95% about song and it never will be just about song. Unless it will be broadcast on the radio only :lol:


Has it? When you say so it will be like that but I just see Croatian Dora went Idol, Slovenian EMA was replaced with Idol, BBC tried Idol in 2009 and 2010, Germany comes up with Idol. That all happened after the jury's come back. Probably there have been one or two pre-selections with idol format in years 1998-2008 (honestly I am not an uberexpert here) but I doubt it was popular to that extent it is at the moment. But again, feel free to disabuse me here.
Yep it had. We used such format in 2006.
And tbh every selection has something from Idol show. Eurovision is way older than American Idol and auditions/singing covers existed even before Eurovision auditions so I don't understand what's the fuss. Sanremo existed way before the Idol ))))
Also I don't get why blaming (like it's a crime, lol) the juries in something.
Broadcasters used to mention even in the press-releases that they copied German format hoping that it will bring them success. Did they think about Idol? Nope, they just hoped to enter the same river twice (so naive). Such format brought Lena enormous success and "Satellite" became the biggest German best-seller. You were saying something about majority?
If it's all for the juries then how come televoters voted for Lena?



The NFs aren't for Eurovision only, it's also a national event. If the broadcaster wants to try it - this is their full right. Omg, Dora went idol! :eek: *drama*. So?
Don't watch it. This will influence the channel better than some radical sayings a-la STOP THIS.

Azeri NF 2011 also borrowed the Idol format so now certain broadcasters will try to adjust Azeri system for 2012. Copying and even stealing is an ordinary thing for ESC world.

I'm pro-Idol if it's well-organized. It extends ESC process and I can follow more ESC stars,more invited performers, more new performers. Ater all you can always skip the "Idol" part and watch just the final concert :lol:
 
Last edited:

CC92

Well-known member
Joined
May 31, 2011
Posts
7,684
Location
Berlin
Re: SLOVENIA 2012

This comparison with diamonds is useless.
Awesome performer can save the worst and the most primitive song but if the best song is being performed by a sucky, the most horrible performer - nothing can save it. You can spend few billion euros but this won't help xshrug
I say performing is more important - what seems primitive in the beginning can be changed by performance, even the lyrics can sound differently.
Standing on 1 place and performing the best song in the world means zero if it's lifeless performance.
Okay, I beg to differ. I say no one could have saved Aven Romale for instance. A song I personally find no way that bad as 'people' (spoken generally ;)) said but reactions and the final result were non-ambiguous. Or Nikki (the great singer :lol:) could not have saved Stand by but Running scared (no guess why many liked that so much:?) would still have done very well under female vocals by Senit. Unless probably you are a world star and a certain amount of fans will support any crap you in that your name is involved. Then you do not need that prcedure. It is merely a matter of belief though, no way to prove what would have happened under other circumstances. We disagree here but that is no problem.

Seriously I can roar/rape the best song in the world... vote for me! :cool:
Hm... that I want to see. Ukraine, go Idol please.:p

And we don't judge just vocals so your comparison is useless, again. The jury also voted for Eric Saade if you remember correctly.
But I don't think that he finished where he finished only because of the song. He had gimmick performance, dancers, he danced himself etc., he's a young cutie with Arabian roots. The song only? Nah! :lol:

Same goes to every performer, Slovenian too. It's not 95% about song and it never will be just about song. Unless it will be broadcast on the radio only :lol:
Jury favoured Austria over Sweden whereas in televoting Austria was bottom-2 and Sweden top-2. So I chose this example. However, yes, his gimmick performance must have played a very large role. I think the dancing/staging thing is way more attractive for most viewers than a voice actually. If idol formats want to be successful they definitely should take those abilities under consideration. Usually the candates are just standing and singing something.

Also I don't get why blaming (like it's a crime, lol) the juries in something.
Broadcasters used to mention even in the press-releases that they copied German format hoping that it will bring them success. Did they think about Idol? Nope, they just hoped to enter the same river twice (so naive). Such format brought Lena enormous success and "Satellite" became the biggest German best-seller. You were saying something about majority?
If it's all for the juries then how come televoters voted for Lena?
Lena knew how to sell it (at ESC) but it became a success because – besides promotion – it was a catchy contemporary pop tune. This year she performed Taken by a stranger that neither came close to a second victory nor to an international chart hit. All in all NDR was just lucky in 2010 that someone submitted that massive hit tune. Apart from the fact that I consider importing songs as 'legal cheating' and would not be proud of the goals I reach with them but that is another aspect. Nevertheless you are right when you say broadcasters feel they would need to copy certain formats that just worked well recently. Although there never is a guarantee and sometimes trying something new or even sticking to a 'loser format' might be more clever. Trends come and go.
So there is more than just one influences, indeed. One also could question why Azerbaijan even stuck so penetrataively to idol and Swedish songwriters? Not coincidentally because they saw what the jury is doing with local flavoured entries? For sure is that they wanted to win badly. Keeping causes and effects strictly apart is impossible.

The NFs aren't for Eurovision only, it's also a national event.
I admit that I might be a little biassed when it comes to Idol shows. Because I see only how it 'works' here in Germany and it is a complete mess. Musicwise and careerwise. It might be different elsewhere but I prefer experienced musicians who know about their job. And at best those who are popular or accepted so they can represent their country's music scene or culture.

Ater all you can always skip the "Idol" part and watch just the final concert :lol:
I will do that but I just miss EMA and want as many song-based national finals a possible. They offer much more diversity and the actual masterpieces are very rarely sent. :(
 
Last edited:

AlekS

Veteran
Joined
October 1, 2009
Posts
26,872
Location
Ukraine
Re: SLOVENIA 2012

Okay, I beg to differ. I say no one could have saved Aven Romale for instance. A song I personally find no way that bad as 'people' (spoken generally ;)) said but reactions and the final result were non-ambiguous. Or Nikki (the great singer :lol:) could not have saved Stand by but Running scared (no guess why many liked that so much:?) would still have done very well under female vocals by Senit. Unless probably you are a world star and a certain amount of fans will support any crap you in that your name is involved. Then you do not need that prcedure. It is merely a matter of belief though, no way to prove what would have happened under other circumstances. We disagree here but that is no problem.
Nobody will never find out what people (in general) thought about that song. Imo, it could be saved by real gypsies with normal humour.
Verka's Danzing is not for everybody as well, however it became the best gimmick entry of the decade with all countries giving us points (minus Albania, lol).
Lena wasn't a great singer too and she had a simple mediocre song with awful lyrics.
I'm afarid "Running Scared" is not for Senit, at all. It's like forcing Britney go opera. Bad idea, though hilarious :lol:
Nobody can prove what would have happened just like nobody can talk about people in general without asking them. It's just talking about possible stuff, no more no less.

Hm... that I want to see. Ukraine, go Idol please.:p
No, thanks. All Ukraine "lovers" can relax, I won't give them such happiness, lol )))


Jury favoured Austria over Sweden whereas in televoting Austria was bottom-2 and Sweden top-2. So I chose this example. However, yes, his gimmick performance must have played a very large role. I think the dancing/staging thing is way more attractive for most viewers than a voice actually. If idol formats want to be successful they definitely should take those abilities under consideration. Usually the candates are just standing and singing something.
Which didn't really save her. Btw, I voted for Austria and for Georgia. One was praised by the juries, another one was pawned. In the end Austria didn't overpass Sweden though and Azerbaijan would be 1st still.
The jury saved Slovenia btw, and I voted for Slovenia in the semi. I wouldn't called Slovenian entry as something that could be preefred by the juries :shock: :lol: As well as Estonia. Also the juries pawned our ballad. The voting was unpredictable. So the "format" doesn't really decide anything.
I think it's more about being commercial and what can be played/promoted all over Europe. Not neccessary "Idol" stuff.


Nevertheless you are right when you say broadcasters feel they would need to copy certain formats that just worked well recently. Although there never is a guarantee and sometimes trying something new or even sticking to a 'loser format' might be more clever. Trends come and go.
I am right because they don't even hide it.
And yes, there's never a guarantee though the best commercial tune can be chosen in any way (the NF - Rybak, "Idol" - El & Nikki/Lena or internally - Bilan, we all know that he was chosen by the channel bosses, lol)... look at all winners since 2008. Only commercial radio hits. All of them were overplayed to bits here. Imo, pre-2008 time was more diverse. From cheesyness or ethno to rock and a ballad.
That's why I like Slovenia - they manage to prepare something different. Maybe not the best sometimes but they don't try to follow some "format" and be like everyone.


So there is more than just one influences, indeed. One also could question why Azerbaijan even stuck so penetrataively to idol and Swedish songwriters? Not coincidentally because they saw what the jury is doing with local flavoured entries? For sure is that they wanted to win badly. Keeping causes and effects strictly apart is impossible.
I don't understand you here because MF is not an Idol format. They take world-wide famous Swedish producers who produce commercial hits, it's not really about Idols. They also prepare their performers in Ukraine all the time - that's because they have long-time connections with our broadcasters and specialists. Our companies help them with the NF and then preparing for ESC here.
You saw yourself that the juries didn't prefer Sweden xshrug so it's not really a positive factor ;)


I admit that I might be a little biassed when it comes to Idol shows. Because I see only how it 'works' here in Germany and it is a complete mess. Musicwise and careerwise. It might be different elsewhere but I prefer experienced musicians who know about their job. And at best those who are popular or accepted so they can represent their country's music scene or culture.


I will do that but I just miss EMA and want as many song-based national finals a possible. They offer much more diversity and the actual masterpieces are very rarely sent. :(
You know, it's always a mess in big countries like ours because of big competition on our music markets. It's hard for newcomers to avoid "1-hit-wonder" label because usually their producers leave them after the 1st album and start producing people from the next edition ;)

In Ukraine it's different though because we have different producers for each Star Factory. All performers from the 2nd edition became mega famous here, they founded their own agency among with producer and they exist for years and they still release veeery popular singles. For instance one of them recorded a duo with Alyosha and it broke the national record with 20 consecutive weeks at #1. Like 4-5 years after that idol show?

X-Factor... all finalists have been signed by big labels. Some of them were taken by their "coaches" to their agencies, some of them were spotted by big producers, some of them were endorsed by the channel and they host the most rating shows :D
They have a life after the show and it's more about talents. Btw, music diversity was huge - from ethno, opera and rock to rap, pop and ancient ballads, lol. From African folk to Eskimo :shock: :lol:
We had all ESC winners since Maria Serifovic, we had Lara Fabian and numerous ESC-related performers.
All our talent shows are sponsored by art-funds (one of the biggest in Europe), if you talk about music - it's reeeeeally different from American and even British equivalent. It's like having someone's format with our music and our traditions, mixing it with huuuge multi-cultural diversity. From Brazil to Japan. From Ukraine to Australia.

I like this year's EMA. There's something European but in the same time it's adapted to Slovenian music. You can sing Amy Winehouse but still it sounds Slovenian.
 
Last edited:

Kryptonite

Well-known member
Joined
December 12, 2010
Posts
6,170
Location
Slovenia
Re: SLOVENIA 2012

Qualifers:

- Eva Boto

46337_eva-boto_portrait_big.jpg


- Flora Ema Lotrič

46325_flora-ema-lotri-_portrait_big.jpg


- Nastja Gabor

46321_nastja-gabor_portrait_big.jpg


- Gašper Rifelj

46324_ga-per-rifelj_portrait_big.jpg


(videos will be uploaded soon...)
 

CPV4931

Well-known member
Joined
February 25, 2011
Posts
6,886
Location
Germany
Re: SLOVENIA 2012

Nastja Gabor, Ema Boto and Flora Ema Lotric - my three favorites came thourgh :-)
I just wished Leaparfume instead of Gasper Rifelj - but he also sang nice.
 

KilledByShoes

Active member
Joined
October 11, 2009
Posts
144
Re: SLOVENIA 2012

Can I just say that I haven't even thought about how sucessful this kind of NF will be because I'm too happy about the fact that we finally have a Slovenian TV show that is not only bearable but actually fun? So let me enjoy this and I'll start complaining about bad songs when we get to that part.
 

CPV4931

Well-known member
Joined
February 25, 2011
Posts
6,886
Location
Germany
Re: SLOVENIA 2012

I hoped for Manuela Brecko, Adrijana Lorber, Sarah Senica and Klemen to come thorugh. At leaat Manulea Brecko and Sarah Sencia passed the heats. Congrats to Nika & Eva Prusnik and Nika Zurja - they weren´t bad at all! (I don´t know, if all the names are right, because I just quickly noticed them on my paper)
 

LokoFan444

Active member
Joined
March 19, 2011
Posts
2,016
Location
Smolensk
Re: SLOVENIA 2012

Maybe ... but then so Klemen jury did not like ... and the image and style and voice are bad for them.Very sad(
 

CPV4931

Well-known member
Joined
February 25, 2011
Posts
6,886
Location
Germany
Re: SLOVENIA 2012

Today, there was the last heat - Imo a quite bad one. At least, two of my favorites came through.
 
Top Bottom