doctormalisimo
Well-known member
eNtRy SeNt We LoOk FoRwArD tO aN eDiTiOn In ThReE iCoNiC nAtIoNs
Aimūlli Necluda | @Territrius @Judas |
Your entry was found, along with a number of others. This highlights the importance of reading the instructions in the first post.I see my nation on the list of debtors.
But...The application was sent this afternoon.
So did somebody else withdraw? We had five nations who had to confirm or else be kicked off and but they all confirmed. Seeing as Pen Island and Oussou Empire both announced their withdrawal before the deadline, Necluda and Marcobia got to join the roster regardless whether they sent an entry or not.Competing nations:
Afnia (Debut)
I hate to stick my neck out in anything forum related these days but my understanding is that Afnia sending an entry and Necluda not doing so would mean Afnia would debut. NSC, please angrily react to this if I'm wrong...So did somebody else withdraw? We had five nations who had to confirm or else be kicked off and but they all confirmed. Seeing as Pen Island and Oussou Empire both announced their withdrawal before the deadline, Necluda and Marcobia got to join the roster regardless whether they sent an entry or not.
I hate to stick my neck out in anything forum related these days but my understanding is that Afnia sending an entry and Necluda not doing so would mean Afnia would debut. NSC, please angrily react to this if I'm wrong...
This is correct, I didn't send an entry in 218 despite being first on WL and had to wait until next edition.I hate to stick my neck out in anything forum related these days but my understanding is that Afnia sending an entry and Necluda not doing so would mean Afnia would debut. NSC, please angrily react to this if I'm wrong...
I don't really think so, the rule of reserve entries starts with explicitly naming the situation where it applies:Then it is bad use of language cause it's not clear enough what it's implying.
5. If a nation on the roster has missed confirming and is therefore subject of removal if they fail to confirm in the next edition,
Yeah, I agree with this. Due to the historical ambiguity in how this rule has been applied over the years, the host team should decide whether Afnia debuts.Anyway, I do not think a poll is necessary, I think rule 6.7 takes priority here. If the host team decides Afnia will debut, then Afnia will debut.
I knew I hadn't gone crazy and misinterpreted the rules all these years! There have always been two ways of joining the roster, at least in all the years I've been a part of this contest. Those that join before the deadline and those that join after the deadline.No, Anna is correct, 2a.5 only applies to cases when nations are removed by missed confirmations and when the confirmation deadline passes.
In this case the nations have formally withdrawn by their own decisions, and when that happens the top WL nation is promoted effective immediately regardless of where we are in an edition as per rule 2a.2. Reserve entries do not override this.
If it's been handled differently in the past, it's because the rule has been misunderstood. I don't mind if people want to keep doing it like that, I'm just informing you as the original author that it was not the written intent of that rule.
Seeing as I wasn't able to update the roster until the last day of confirmation, that didn't give Necluda a lot of hours to even know they have made it to the roster. I'm willing to agree that Afnia can also debut due to this mix up, but not at the expense of Necluda since they've joined the roster fair and square according to the rules. So we have three debuting nations, just that one of them failed to confirm.Glad we're all on the same page. I see no reason why this entry shouldn't be accepted. Letting a nation debut without a competing entry would basically be a waste of roster space when there are nations who "show up". Afnia has shown their will to participate and that should be honored.
Donatella VERSACE