ESC United Mod Team
Super Moderator
- Joined
- February 10, 2021
- Posts
- 214
Yeah and very very recently they had a government that found that decision stupid and reverted it.
It's obviously not a democratic heaven, but I think instead of alienating them, we can actually let them in and thus they will familarize themselves with Europe and integrate better. Cuz they actually want to join the family, they make great efforts for it. Why fence off somebody who actually wants to join you and learn from you, and also teach you what they are better at? It will be a win-win situation after all.
If Sertab can win the televote by going out as 4th, any song can win at any position. What would be a bias killing placement for a song placed in the second half?And how is it better when odds favourites are given good spots and lesser entries are buried for the sake of a "good show". Looks like there's winner and losers on each side.
Change is good when done well. Production planned draw could be improved if bias killing factors are introduced.
If Sertab can win the televote by going out as 4th, any song can win at any position. What would be a bias killing placement for a song placed in the second half?
I'm for it, because fans always go on and on about how the winner needs to have a good slot and yet in the last 10 years we've seen winning positions be #10 (out of 27), #11 (twice), #12. I just hate that the random draw can potentially destroy the flow of the show.The fact that your example is from 2003, an edition, btw, in which the recap starts from the last song towards the first.
So are you for or against production picked draw? I'm confused.